Why are Hoogsteen base pairs energetically disfavored in A-RNA compared to B-DNA?

Atul Rangadurai1, Huiqing Zhou1, Dawn K Merriman2

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Nucleic Acids Research
|October 5, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Hoogsteen base pairs are less stable in A-RNA than B-DNA due to structural differences. Altering A-RNA geometry reduces this energetic cost, revealing key insights into nucleic acid structure and function.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Hoogsteen (HG) base pairs are less energetically favored in A-RNA compared to B-DNA, a phenomenon not fully understood.
  • This energetic difference is significant, exceeding 1 kcal/mol for specific HG base pairs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the factors contributing to the destabilization of HG base pairs in A-RNA.
  • To compare the energetic costs of HG base pair formation in A-RNA versus B-DNA.

Main Methods:

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
  • Optical melting experiments
  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
  • Modified nucleotides

Main Results:

  • Removing the 2'-hydroxyl group did not stabilize HG base pairs in A-RNA.
  • Modifying A-RNA structure to mimic B-DNA geometry reduced the energetic cost of HG base pair formation.
  • A-form geometry incurs a 1.5-4 kcal/mol penalty for syn purines and an additional 3-4 kcal/mol penalty for purine-pyrimidine HG base pairs compared to B-DNA.

Conclusions:

  • A-form geometry inherently disfavors syn purines due to steric constraints and requires significant sugar-backbone rearrangements.
  • The energetic penalty for HG base pair formation in A-RNA is significantly higher than in B-DNA, influenced by base accessibility and hydrogen bonding requirements.
  • These findings highlight fundamental structural and energetic differences between A-RNA and B-DNA, impacting their biological roles and responses to modifications.

Related Concept Videos

DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.3K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.6K
Base-pairing and DNA Repair02:27

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

93.5K
Relative Strengths of Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs02:29

Relative Strengths of Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs

Brønsted-Lowry acid-base chemistry is the transfer of protons; thus, logic suggests a relation between the relative strengths of conjugate acid-base pairs. The strength of an acid or base is quantified in its ionization constant, Ka or Kb, which represents the extent of the acid or base ionization reaction. For the conjugate acid-base pair HA / A−, the ionization equilibrium equations and ionization constant expressions are
52.5K
Bacterial RNA Polymerase00:43

Bacterial RNA Polymerase

Unlike eukaryotes, bacteria use a single RNA Polymerase (RNAP) to transcribe all genes. The different subunits of bacterial RNAPhave distinct functions. The multisubunit structure of the bacterial RNAP helps the enzyme to maintain catalytic function, facilitate assembly, interact with DNA and RNA, and self-regulate its activity.
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...
32.8K
Energetics of Solution Formation02:35

Energetics of Solution Formation

The formation of a solution is an example of a spontaneous process, which is a process that occurs under specified conditions without energy from some external source.
When the strengths of the intermolecular forces of attraction between solute and solvent species in a solution are no different than those present in the separated components, the solution is formed with no accompanying energy change. Formation of the solution requires the solute–solute and solvent–solvent...
7.4K