Strategy for performing treponemal tests in reverse-sequence algorithms of syphilis diagnosis

In South Korea, automated T. pallidum Latex Agglutination (TPLA) based on turbidoimmunoassays and immunochromatographic assay (ICA) are widely used for syphilis diagnosis. However, there is sparse data on the validation of these assays in the reverse-sequence algorithm setting.

We assessed 551 specimens submitted for syphilis testing. We compared varying reverse-sequence algorithms using combinations of the Cobas Syphilis EIA (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), Mediace TPLA (Sekisui Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan), TPPA (Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and SD Bioline ICA (Standard Diagnostic, Yongin, Korea). We also evaluated modified algorithms incorporating a cut off of high specificity for EIA and TPLA using receiver operating characteristic curves.

The agreement was almost perfect between EIA and TPLA (Kappa, 0.953) and strong between TPPA and ICA (Kappa, 0.887). Among TPPA positive and ICA negative specimens, 67% of the specimens were from individuals with syphilis histories. Compared to EIA/RPR/TPPA, the agreement with EIA/RPR/ICA, TPLA/RPR/TPPA and TPLA/RPR/ICA were almost perfect (Kappa, 0.930, 0.995 and 0.914, respectively). When a cut off of 95% specificity was applied, the number of TPPA tests could be reduced by 44% and 40% in EIA and TPLA, respectively.

TPLA showed almost perfect agreement with EIA and that it could be used in the site of EIA in a reverse sequence algorithm. ICA showed a lower detection rate than TPPA as a 2nd treponemal test and should be used with caution. With cut offs of higher specificity, more efficient reverse-sequence algorithms can be made possible.