Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
Published on: November 11, 2022
Life beyond the Tanimoto coefficient: similarity measures for interaction fingerprints
Anita Rácz1, Dávid Bajusz2, Károly Héberger1
1Plasma Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Background:
Interaction fingerprints (IFP) have been repeatedly shown to be valuable tools in virtual screening to identify novel hit compounds that can subsequently be optimized to drug candidates. As a complementary method to ligand docking, IFPs can be applied to quantify the similarity of predicted binding poses to a reference binding pose. For this purpose, a large number of similarity metrics can be applied, and various parameters of the IFPs themselves can be customized. In a large-scale comparison, we have assessed the effect of similarity metrics and IFP configurations to a number of virtual screening scenarios with ten different protein targets and thousands of molecules. Particularly, the effect of considering general interaction definitions (such as Any Contact, Backbone Interaction and Sidechain Interaction), the effect of filtering methods and the different groups of similarity metrics were studied.
Results:
The performances were primarily compared based on AUC values, but we have also used the original similarity data for the comparison of similarity metrics with several statistical tests and the novel, robust sum of ranking differences (SRD) algorithm. With SRD, we can evaluate the consistency (or concordance) of the various similarity metrics to an ideal reference metric, which is provided by data fusion from the existing metrics. Different aspects of IFP configurations and similarity metrics were examined based on SRD values with analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests.
Conclusion:
A general approach is provided that can be applied for the reliable interpretation and usage of similarity measures with interaction fingerprints. Metrics that are viable alternatives to the commonly used Tanimoto coefficient were identified based on a comparison with an ideal reference metric (consensus). A careful selection of the applied bits (interaction definitions) and IFP filtering rules can improve the results of virtual screening (in terms of their agreement with the consensus metric). The open-source Python package FPKit was introduced for the similarity calculations and IFP filtering; it is available at: https://github.com/davidbajusz/fpkit .
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Life
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Half-life of a Reaction
Coefficient of Variation
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...

