Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Porcine Model of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: November 21, 2019
Aortoiliac calcification correlates with 5-year survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Matthew J TerBush1, Khurram Rasheed1, Zane Z Young1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Insights
A calcium scoring system (CS) predicts survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. A CS of 3 or higher is linked to lower 5-year survival rates in AAA patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Anatomic factors influence outcomes in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
- The Anatomic Severity Grade (ASG) score categorizes AAA repair complexity.
- Predictive value of individual ASG components for survival requires further validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and validate an aortic and iliac artery calcium scoring system (CS) for predicting survival after AAA repair.
- To determine if CS can serve as a risk stratification tool for midterm mortality.
- To guide surgical decision-making in AAA repair.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 356 patients undergoing infrarenal AAA repair with 5-year follow-up.
- Calcium score (CS) calculated from preoperative imaging based on ASG criteria (0-5 points).
- Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify CS threshold for mortality; Cox proportional hazards model used for risk assessment.
Main Results:
- A CS threshold of 3 was identified as significant for mortality prediction.
- Patients with CS ≥3 exhibited a lower 5-year survival probability (P = .003).
- CS ≥3 was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.579 (P = .0328) for 5-year mortality.
Conclusions:
- A CS of 3 or higher is associated with reduced 5-year survival following AAA repair.
- The CS system shows potential for risk stratification and predicting midterm mortality in AAA patients.
- Further validation is necessary to refine its use in surgical decision-making.
Background:
An anatomic severity grade (ASG) score to categorize and to define anatomic factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair was proposed. Other studies have previously reported that aortic anatomic complexity is a marker of survival and resource utilization after repair, although it remains unclear whether individual components of the ASG score independently contribute to survival. This study analyzed and validated an aortic and iliac artery calcium scoring system that can potentially predict survival after AAA repair.
Methods:
Patients who underwent infrarenal AAA repairs from July 2007 to May 2012 were analyzed using complete 5-year records. Those who died ≤30 days of surgery were excluded. Calcium score (CS) was defined using the ASG scoring system for its basis by preoperative imaging <6 months before surgery. A CS for any patient was 0 to 5 points, the sum of the points assigned to aortic neck (2 points total) and iliac artery (3 points total) calcification. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine a CS threshold for mortality. The 5-year survivors and deaths were compared in regard to comorbidities, pharmacology, and CS at or above the defined threshold. Each variable with a P value <.1 between the groups was then placed into a Cox proportional hazards model, with statistical significance of P < .05.
Results:
There were 356 patients who underwent AAA repair with complete 5-year follow-up data; 26% died within 5 years of surgery. Of these, 13% had CS of 0 with 15% mortality, 28% had CS of 1 with 21% mortality, 24% had CS of 2 with 24% mortality, 23% had CS of 3 with 35% mortality, 10% had CS of 4 with 40% mortality, and 2% had CS of 5 with 17% mortality. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated an appropriate threshold of CS 3. Of these patients, 65% had a CS <3, whereas 35% had a CS ≥3. Patients with a CS ≥3 had a lower 5-year survival probability (P = .003). Comparing 5-year survivors and deaths in a Cox proportional hazards analysis, CS ≥3 was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.579 (95% confidence interval, 1.038-2.402; P = .0328).
Conclusions:
A CS ≥3 is linked to a lower 5-year survival after AAA repair in our population. This system potentially can be another measure for risk stratification and serve as a means to predict midterm mortality in AAA repairs. Future study will be needed for further validation to predict midterm mortality and to better guide surgical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Correlations
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Correlation
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...

