Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Femoral Bone Marrow Aspiration in Live Mice
Published on: July 5, 2014
Outcomes after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study with three-year follow-up
B Herngren1,2, M Stenmarker2,3, K Enskär4
1Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.
Insights
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treatment outcomes show avascular necrosis (AVN) risk with capital realignment. Rigorous follow-up of both hips is recommended until physeal closure.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Pediatric orthopedics
- Hip joint biomechanics
Background:
- Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a hip condition affecting adolescents.
- Long-term outcomes of SCFE treatment require further investigation.
- Understanding risks like avascular necrosis (AVN) is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate three-year outcomes after SCFE treatment.
- Assess the incidence of AVN, need for subsequent surgery, and hip function.
- Examine contralateral hip development post-SCFE.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 379 children treated for SCFE (2007-2013).
- Analysis of 449 SCFE-treated hips and 151 prophylactically fixed hips.
- Utilized the Barnhöft questionnaire for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Main Results:
- AVN developed in 25 of 449 SCFE hips; 6 of 15 hips treated with capital realignment developed AVN.
- Peri-implant fractures occurred in 5 hips, with technical difficulties noted in 3.
- Contralateral SCFE developed in 43 of 201 hips; implant extraction was common post-physeal closure.
Conclusions:
- Fixation in situ remains the preferred primary treatment for SCFE.
- Prophylactic fixation is safe with correct technique; capital realignment poses an AVN concern.
- Rigorous follow-up, including PROMs, for both hips until physeal closure is recommended.
Purpose:
To evaluate outcomes three years after treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE): development of avascular necrosis (AVN), subsequent surgery, hip function and the contralateral hip.
Methods:
This prospective cohort study included a total national population of 379 children treated for SCFE between 2007 and 2013. A total of 449 hips treated for SCFE and 151 hips treated with a prophylactic fixation were identified. The Barnhöft questionnaire, a valid patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), was used.
Results:
In all, 90 hips had a severe slip, 61 of these were clinically unstable. AVN developed in 25 of the 449 hips. Six of 15 hips treated with capital realignment developed AVN. A peri-implant femur fracture occurred in three slipped hips and in two prophylactically pinned hips. In three of these five hips technical difficulties during surgery was identified. In 43 of 201 hips scheduled for regular follow-up a subsequent SCFE developed in the contralateral hip. Implant extraction after physeal closure was performed in 156 of 449 hips treated for SCFE and in 51 of 151 prophylactically fixed hips. Children with impaired hip function could be identified using the Barnhöft questionnaire.
Conclusion:
Fixation in situ is justified to remain as the primary treatment of choice in SCFE. Overweight is more common in children with SCFE than in the average population. Prophylactic fixation is a safe procedure when performed using a correct technique. The number of patients who developed AVN after capital realignment is of concern. We recommend rigorous follow-up of both hips, including PROM evaluation, until physeal closure.
Level Of Evidence:
II - prospective cohort study.
Related Concept Videos
Rolling Without Slipping
Rolling With Slipping
An object's rolling motion is characterized by its rotation around its axis, while linear motion refers to the object's translational motion along a surface. Frictional forces can...
What is Population Genetics?
What are Populations and Communities?
Conservation of Small Populations
Population Growth

