Systematic Analysis of Transmitter Coexpression Reveals Organizing Principles of Local Interneuron Heterogeneity
Kristyn M Lizbinski1, Gary Marsat1, Andrew M Dacks1
1Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505.
Eneuro
|October 9, 2018
Summary
Olfactory local interneurons (LNs) in moths show diverse transmitter coexpression, challenging simple subclass definitions. Computational models reveal specific organizing principles governing this complex neuronal communication.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Olfactory system research
- Insect neurobiology
Background:
- Neuronal classes exhibit heterogeneity, with overlapping traits like transmitter coexpression.
- The consistency and predictability of transmitter coexpression patterns remain largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the extent of predictable, consistent patterns in transmitter coexpression.
- To analyze pairwise coexpression of GABA and neuropeptides in olfactory local interneurons (LNs).
Main Methods:
- Experimental analysis of neuropeptide coexpression in Manduca sexta LNs.
- Computational modeling to assess expression probabilities and identify organizing principles.
Main Results:
- Pairwise coexpression of GABA and multiple neuropeptide families in LNs is highly heterogeneous.
- Computational modeling identified three key organizing principles: GABA coexpression likelihood, allatotropin dependency on myoinhibitory peptide, and tachykinin's all-or-none patterns.
- Receptor expression for all studied modulators in principal neurons suggests broad influence of LNs.
Conclusions:
- The stochastic nature of coexpression highlights LN transmitter content heterogeneity, arguing against simple subpopulation definitions.
- LN activation releases a dynamic cocktail of modulators influencing all levels of olfactory processing in the antennal lobe (AL).
Related Concept Videos
The Aufbau Principle and Hund's Rule
72.8K
To determine the electron configuration for any particular atom, we can build the structures in the order of atomic numbers. Beginning with hydrogen, and continuing across the periods of the periodic table, we add one proton at a time to the nucleus and one electron to the proper subshell until we have described the electron configurations of all the elements. This procedure is called the aufbau principle, from the German word aufbau (“to build up”). Each added electron occupies the...
72.8K
The Uncertainty Principle
31.9K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.9K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
76.3K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
76.3K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
59.3K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
59.3K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K


