Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reflections on queer theory and communication.

Journal of homosexuality·2003
Same journal

Thank you to our distinguished editors.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
Same journal

Corrigenda to "The Oldham Notebooks: An analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. II. The treatment cycles and their outcomes" [Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online 1/1 (2015) 9-18].

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
Same journal

Symposium: Reproductive technology and the conceptualization of the biological clock.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
Same journal

<i>RBMS</i> says farewell.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
Same journal

Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
Same journal

Families formed through assisted reproductive technology: Causes, experiences, and consequences in an international context.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke
08:23

Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke

Published on: July 26, 2021

2.9K

Kindred spirits?

Joshua Gamson1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
|October 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary explores reproductive politics, linking family-making, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice. It highlights self-determination and expanded kinship as key themes, while addressing complex tensions in assisted reproduction and queer family-making.

Keywords:
assisted reproductionkinshipqueerreproductive justice

More Related Videos

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

40.8K
Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
06:05

Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Published on: January 27, 2023

28.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke
08:23

Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke

Published on: July 26, 2021

2.9K
T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

40.8K
Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
06:05

Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Published on: January 27, 2023

28.1K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Discussions on expanding family-making options, reducing inequities in assisted reproduction and adoption, and securing reproductive rights are ongoing.
  • Reproductive justice frameworks advocate for a broader understanding of reproductive autonomy and well-being.
  • Existing social and economic inequalities impact access to and experiences within various family-making pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the connections and tensions between diverse reproductive politics initiatives.
  • To identify core principles guiding efforts in family-making, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice.
  • To examine the ethical and social complexities arising from these interconnected areas.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary and critical reflection on existing literature and social debates.
  • Analysis of the interplay between self-determination and evolving concepts of kinship.
  • Examination of case studies, including surrogacy ethics and queer family-making.

Main Results:

  • Two central themes emerge: commitment to self-determination and an expanded understanding of kinship.
  • Significant tensions exist between these themes, particularly concerning surrogacy and the influence of class and racial inequalities on queer family-making.
  • These tensions require direct confrontation to advance reproductive justice.

Conclusions:

  • Political kinship, grounded in family justice, offers a framework for concrete action.
  • Advancing reproductive justice necessitates addressing systemic inequities within family-making.
  • An inclusive approach to kinship and self-determination is crucial for equitable reproductive futures.