Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Pre-clinical Model of Cardiac Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 2, 2019
International validation of harmonized definitions for complications of blood donations
Kevin J Land1,2, Mary Townsend1, Mindy Goldman3
1Blood Systems, Inc., San Antonio, Texas.
Insights
Harmonized definitions for blood donation complications were validated globally. While generally consistent, optional terms like severity grading require clearer definitions for improved donor safety surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Hemovigilance
- Blood Donor Safety
Background:
- Multinational experts developed harmonized definitions for blood donation complications in 2014.
- These definitions, including mandatory and optional terms, are endorsed by major blood operator alliances.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the harmonized donor hemovigilance definitions with potential users worldwide.
- Assess the practical application and consistency of the standardized definitions.
Main Methods:
- 30 real-world blood donation complication cases were distributed globally in 2016.
- Potential users received definitions, answer sheets, and instructions for a validation exercise.
Main Results:
- 54 responses from 25 countries provided over 400 comments.
- Case diagnoses showed high consistency, with exceptions for rare events or incomplete data.
- Application of optional definitions, particularly severity grading and imputability, exhibited the most variability.
Conclusions:
- Standardized terms enhance donor safety focus, communication, and research framing.
- Definitions adequately cover donor reactions but need clarification, especially for optional terms.
- Clearer, objective definitions and usage instructions are needed for severity grading and imputability.
Background:
In December 2014, a multinational collaboration of hemovigilance experts from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), the International Hemovigilance Network, and AABB published harmonized definitions of complications related to blood donation titled "Standard for Surveillance of Complications Related to Blood Donation." Both mandatory and optional terms were included. The definitions are endorsed by the Alliance of Blood Operators and the European Blood Alliance.
Study Design And Methods:
The objective of this study was to validate harmonized donor hemovigilance definitions with potential users. In June 2016, 30 real-world cases were sent to potential users around the world along with the definitions, an answer sheet, and instructions on how to complete the validation exercise.
Results:
Overall, 54 responses from 25 countries were received, including over 400 comments. The results were presented for feedback at both ISBT and AABB meetings. Case diagnoses were consistent across most responders. Exceptions were rare adverse events, nonstandard presentations, or incomplete information. In general, the application of optional definitions, including severity grading and imputability, had the most variability.
Conclusion:
The use of standardized terms in the donor setting serves to increase focus on donor safety, facilitate conversation, foster exchange of information, and frame questions for future research. Overall, the definitions provide adequate coverage of donor reactions; however, some terms require clarification. Severity grading and imputability and other optional terms need clear and objective definitions and instructions on when and how to use them. Additional feedback and final recommendations are summarized in this report.
Related Concept Videos
Harmonic Mean
Take the example of the speed of a car, which is the measure of the rate of distance traveled. If the vehicle traverses the same distance back-and-forth, its average speed equals the total distance traveled divided by the total time taken. However, if the car moves with varying speeds, then the arithmetic mean is more skewed...
Reliability and Validity
Internal Energy
Definite Integral
Internal Receptors
Definition of z-Transform

