Is very low LDL-C harmful?

Charles Faselis1, Konstantinos Imprialos2, Haris Grassos3

  • 1VA Medical Center and George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Insights

Lowering Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to 40-50 mg/dl is safe and offers cardiovascular benefits. Limited data suggest levels below 25 mg/dl may also be beneficial.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) is a primary cardiovascular risk factor.
  • A linear association exists between LDL-C levels and cardiovascular risk.
  • The optimal lower limit of LDL-C for cardiovascular benefits without safety concerns is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the safety of achieving very low LDL-C levels from major lipid-lowering drug studies.
  • To discuss safety events associated with significantly reduced LDL-C levels.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted.
  • Data from clinical studies on LDL-C and safety outcomes were identified and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Large trials show cardiovascular benefits with LDL-C levels of 50 mg/dl or less.
  • Reduction of LDL-C to these levels was not linked to significant adverse events.
  • Cancer and hemorrhagic stroke incidence did not increase at LDL-C below 40-50 mg/dl.
  • Neurocognitive safety data are mixed but mostly favor low LDL-C levels.

Conclusions:

  • Achieving LDL-C of 40-50 mg/dl appears safe and beneficial for cardiovascular health.
  • Limited data suggest potential benefits for LDL-C levels below 25 mg/dl.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Receptor-mediated Endocytosis01:39

Receptor-mediated Endocytosis

Overview
110.9K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
30.4K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.4K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.6K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.6K