Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

08:17
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
16.2K
Quantifying the setup uncertainty of a stereotactic murine micro-image guided radiation therapy system
Matthew C Walb1, Brett L Carlson1, Jann N Sarkaria1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN.
The British Journal of Radiology
|October 10, 2018
Summary
Stereotactic stage positioning for murine cranial irradiation is reproducible within a millimeter. For submillimeter accuracy, daily image guidance is essential, improving efficiency in high-throughput experiments.
Area of Science:
- * Preclinical research
- * Radiation oncology
- * Neuroscience
Background:
- * Stereotactic stages are crucial for precise animal model positioning in preclinical research.
- * Image guidance systems enhance accuracy in radiation therapy.
- * Reproducibility is key for reliable experimental outcomes in animal studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To assess the reproducibility of murine cranial positioning using a stereotactic stage.
- * To quantify accuracy improvements offered by the X-RAD SmART irradiator's on-board image guidance.
- * To establish guidelines for stereotactic accuracy in preclinical irradiation experiments.
Main Methods:
- * Intermouse reproducibility was evaluated using athymic nude mice (N=60 measurements) fixed on a stereotactic stage and imaged with cone-beam CT (CBCT).
- * Intramouse reproducibility was assessed with C57BL/6 mice (N=24 measurements) over seven days, with daily CBCT localization.
- * Positional shifts were calculated to quantify setup accuracy based on stereotactic coordinates and CBCT alignment.
Main Results:
- * Mean vector shifts between stereotactic setup and CBCT alignment were 0.78 ± 0.27 mm for intermouse analysis.
- * Mean vector shifts were 0.82 ± 0.34 mm for intramouse analysis.
- * These results indicate millimeter-level accuracy achievable with stereotactic positioning alone.
Conclusions:
- * Cranial irradiation with millimeter uncertainties can rely on stereotactic coordinates from daily CBCT.
- * Submillimeter accuracy requirements necessitate daily image guidance for each mouse.
- * This study introduces an efficient method for high-throughput stereotactic experiments using the X-RAD SmART irradiator.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Uncertainty Principle
31.9K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.9K
Biological Effects of Radiation
17.9K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
17.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
52.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
52.0K
Uncertainty: Overview
1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures
81.9K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
81.9K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K

