Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Optimized Lung MRI Protocol with Computationally Efficient Reconstruction Methods
Published on: September 6, 2024
Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography
Cara E Morin1, Jonathan R Dillman1,2, Suraj D Serai3
11 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229.
Objective:
The objective of our study was to compare standard breath-held, free-breathing, and compressed sensing (CS) accelerated 2D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) MR elastography (MRE) techniques for measuring liver stiffness.
Subjects And Methods:
Twenty-five adult volunteers (20 without liver disease and five with liver disease) underwent MRE with five different 2D GRE techniques: breath-held; free-breathing; and CS with acceleration factors of 1.5, 2, and 3. Four axial images were obtained through the mid liver with each technique, and liver stiffness measurements (in kilopascals) were made by three blinded readers using elastograms with 95% confidence maps. Liver stiffness measurements were compared between techniques using repeated-measures ANOVA. Absolute agreement between techniques was evaluated for each reader using single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Bland-Altman analyses were performed to assess bias between techniques using breath-held MRE as the reference.
Results:
Individual subject mean liver stiffness values ranged from 1.35 to 5.25 kPa for the population. There was no significant difference in mean liver stiffness values between MRE techniques for readers 1 and 3 (p > 0.05). A significant difference (p = 0.02) due to higher stiffness measurements using free-breathing MRE was observed for reader 2. There was excellent absolute agreement between MRE techniques for each reader (all ICCs > 0.940). Bias between techniques ranged from -0.102 to 0.089 kPa for reader 1, -0.119 to 0.121 kPa for reader 2, and -0.074 to 0.085 kPa for reader 3.
Conclusion:
Free-breathing and CS accelerated 2D GRE MRE techniques yield similar results to the conventional breath-held technique with only slight bias and may be useful in pediatric and adult patients with limited ability to breath-hold.
Related Concept Videos
Breathing
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Mechanism of Breathing I: Inspiration
The respiratory system, an essential network for breathing, comprises the conducting and respiratory zones, each playing a crucial role in the overall process of respiration. Let us explore the detailed mechanism of inspiration, or inhalation, which is the first phase of the respiratory cycle.
Pathway of Air during Inspiration
During inspiration, air enters our body through the nose or mouth and moves through the conducting zone,...
Mechanism of Breathing II: Expiration
Expiration, or exhaling, is a complex physiological process that begins as the inspiratory muscles begin to relax. This relaxation triggers a series of events that epitomize the efficiency of the respiratory system.
Mechanism of Expiration:
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Mechanism of Breathing III: The Accessory Muscles
The respiratory system is a complex network that relies on primary respiratory muscles like the diaphragm, but also involves accessory muscles to enhance lung expansion and airflow during both inhalation and exhalation.
Enhancing Inhalation with Accessory Muscles:
Accessory muscles such as the sternocleidomastoid, scalene, intercostal, and abdominal muscles are crucial when additional respiratory effort is required, such as during deep...

