Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Eligibility Criteria for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement May Worsen Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities
Abigail Y Wang1, Michelle S Wong, Casey Jo Humbyrd
1A. Y. Wang, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA M. S. Wong, Health Services Research & Development, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, US Department of Veteran Affairs, Los Angeles, CA, USA C. J. Humbyrd, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University/Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Insights
Inflexible criteria for lower extremity joint arthroplasty disproportionately reduce access for minority groups and lower socioeconomic status individuals. These criteria worsen existing disparities and limit quality of life improvements from surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery outcomes research
- Health disparities and access to care
- Health economics and policy analysis
Background:
- Cost-containment strategies may lead hospitals to deny surgery for patients with risk factors like high body mass index (BMI), high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or smoking.
- Inflexible eligibility criteria based on these risk factors may worsen existing racial-ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities in accessing lower extremity joint arthroplasty.
- The impact of these criteria on disparities and the most affected groups have not been quantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if inflexible eligibility criteria for lower extremity joint arthroplasty (based on BMI, HbA1c, and smoking status) disproportionately decrease surgery eligibility for racial-ethnic minorities, women, and lower socioeconomic status individuals compared to their counterparts.
- To quantify the effects of these criteria on access to joint arthroplasty.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of pooled data from 21,294 adults aged ≥ 50 years from the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
- Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the odds of eligibility for lower extremity arthroplasty based on BMI (<35 kg/m, <40 kg/m), HbA1c (<8%), and nonsmoker status.
- Independent variables included race-ethnicity, gender, educational level, and annual household income, controlling for age and survey year.
Main Results:
- The BMI < 35 kg/m criterion significantly lowered arthroplasty eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks, women, and individuals of lower socioeconomic status and education.
- The HbA1c < 8% criterion disproportionately reduced eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, lower socioeconomic status individuals, and those with lower educational attainment.
- Excluding smokers also resulted in lower eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks, lower socioeconomic status individuals, and those with lower educational attainment.
Conclusions:
- Inflexible eligibility cutoffs for BMI, HbA1c, and smoking status disproportionately limit access to lower extremity arthroplasty for non-Hispanic blacks and individuals of lower socioeconomic status.
- While uncontrolled comorbidities should be managed, rigid cutoffs for BMI (even >35 or >40 kg/m) are discouraged as BMI is not easily modifiable for many patients.
- These inflexible criteria exacerbate existing racial-ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities, restricting access to life-improving surgical procedures.
Background:
Cost-containment strategies may discourage hospitals from performing surgery for patients with preexisting risk factors such as those with high body mass index (BMI), those with high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or those who smoke cigarettes. Because these risk factors may not appear in equal proportions across the population, using these risk factors as inflexible eligibility criteria for lower extremity joint arthroplasty may exacerbate existing racial-ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities pertaining to access to an operation that can improve health and quality of life. However, any effects on such disparities have not yet been quantified nor have the groups been identified that may be most affected by inflexible eligibility criteria.
Questions/Purposes:
Does the use of inflexible eligibility criteria related to (1) BMI; (2) HbA1c level; and (3) smoking status potentially decrease the odds of lower extremity joint arthroplasty eligibility for members of racial-ethnic minority groups, women, and those of lower socioeconomic status more than it does for non-Hispanic whites, men, and those of higher socioeconomic status?
Methods:
We pooled data from 21,294 adults aged ≥ 50 years from the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). NHANES is a nationally administered series of surveys that assess the health and nutritional status of the US population and collect information on many risk factors for diseases. NHANES is uniquely suited to examine our study questions because it includes data from physical examinations and laboratory assessments as well as comprehensive questionnaires, and it is nationally representative. We determined the odds of lower extremity arthroplasty eligibility by running separate multivariable logistic regressions for each criterion (that is, for each dependent variable): (1) BMI < 35 kg/m; (2) BMI < 40 kg/m; (3) HbA1c < 8%; and (4) current nonsmoker status. Independent variables of interest were race-ethnicity, gender, educational level, and annual household income. Each model included all independent variables of interest, age, and survey year.
Results:
The BMI < 35-kg/m criterion resulted in lower arthroplasty eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.70; p < 0.001), women versus men (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.55-0.69; p < 0.001), individuals of lower socioeconomic status versus those of higher socioeconomic status (annual household income < USD 45,000 versus ≥ USD 45,000 [OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93; p = 0.002], and those with a high school degree or less versus those with a degree beyond a high school degree (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.77; p < 0.001). The HbA1c < 8% criterion resulted in lower arthroplasty eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.37-0.53; p < 0.001) and Hispanics (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.51; p < 0.001) versus non-Hispanic whites, for individuals of lower socioeconomic status versus those of higher socioeconomic status (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94; p = 0.015), and for those with a high school degree or less versus those with a degree beyond a high school degree (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; p < 0.001). Excluding smokers resulted in lower arthroplasty eligibility for non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; p = 0.019), for individuals of lower socioeconomic status versus those of higher socioeconomic status (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.47-0.61; p < 0.001), and for those with a high school degree or less versus those with a degree beyond a high school degree (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.24-0.35; p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Payment structures and clinical decision-making algorithms that set inflexible cutoffs with respect to BMI, HbA1c, and smoking status disproportionately discourage performing lower extremity arthroplasty for non-Hispanic blacks and individuals of lower socioeconomic status. We do not advocate performing elective surgery for patients with multiple, uncontrolled medical comorbidities. However, ample evidence suggests that many patients whose BMI values are > 35 kg/m (or even > 40 kg/m) may be reasonable candidates for arthroplasty surgery, and BMI is not an easily modifiable risk factor for many patients. We discourage across-the-board cutoff parameters in these domains because such cutoffs will worsen current racial-ethnic, gender-based, and socioeconomic disparities and limit access to an operation that can improve quality of life.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, economic and decision analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...

