Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Determining Basal Energy Expenditure and the Capacity of Thermogenic Adipocytes to Expend Energy in Obese Mice
Published on: November 11, 2021
Accelerometer Data Processing and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Preschoolers
Jairo H Migueles1, Christine Delisle Nyström2, Pontus Henriksson1,2
1PROFITH Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, SPAIN.
New wrist accelerometer metrics, like ENMO, better estimate energy expenditure in preschoolers than traditional activity counts. These findings suggest improved methods for tracking physical activity and energy expenditure in young children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric physiology
- Biomedical engineering
- Physical activity research
Background:
- Accurate measurement of energy expenditure in children is crucial for understanding health and activity levels.
- Wrist-worn accelerometers are commonly used to estimate physical activity and energy expenditure.
- Traditional metrics from accelerometers may not fully capture the nuances of movement in young children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of various wrist accelerometer-derived metrics in estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) in preschool children.
- To compare the performance of novel acceleration metrics against standard ActiGraph activity counts.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-nine preschoolers (5.5 ± 0.1 years) participated.
- Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured using the doubly labeled water method over 14 days.
- Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated using predicted basal metabolic rate.
- Participants wore a wGT3X-BT accelerometer on their wrist for at least 5 days.
- Raw acceleration data were used to derive metrics including ActiGraph counts, Euclidian norm minus 1g (ENMO), and other advanced summary metrics.
Main Results:
- Novel metrics, such as ENMO, explained a greater proportion of variance in TEE (13%-16%) and AEE (35%-39%) compared to ActiGraph counts (7%-8% for TEE, 25% for AEE).
- ENMO, adjusted for body weight and height, explained 51% of AEE variance.
- Metrics adjusted for fat mass and fat-free mass explained up to 84% of TEE and 67% of AEE variance.
Conclusions:
- Alternate summary metrics, particularly ENMO, demonstrate superior capacity in estimating TEE and AEE in preschool children compared to traditional ActiGraph counts.
- These findings advocate for the use and further investigation of advanced accelerometer metrics in pediatric physical activity and energy expenditure research.
- Further validation in diverse populations with broader age ranges and varied body compositions is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Binding Energy
Bond Energies and Bond Lengths
What is Energy?
Free Energy
Internal Energy
Energy Basics

