Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Low Mortality Rat Model to Assess Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm After Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Published on: January 17, 2013
Laboratory biomarkers of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review
Ramazan Jabbarli1, Daniela Pierscianek2, Marvin Darkwah Oppong2
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Essen, D-45147, Essen, Germany. ramazan@jabbarli.com.
Insights
No single biomarker reliably predicts delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, 21 biomarkers, including genetic and protein markers, show potential for predicting DCI risk.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Biomarker Research
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a serious complication following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
- Identifying patients at risk for DCI is crucial for timely intervention.
- Clinical and radiographic features of SAH may offer predictive insights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing evidence on the predictive value of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for DCI after SAH.
- To identify reliable biomarkers for early detection of DCI and vasospasm in SAH patients.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 15, 2018.
- Inclusion of original articles and meta-analyses reporting correlations between biomarkers and DCI/vasospasm in SAH patients.
- Quality assessment using QUIPS and STARD guidelines, and evidence level assessment using GRADE guidelines.
Main Results:
- No single biomarker demonstrated Level I evidence for predicting DCI/vasospasm.
- Twenty-one biomarkers achieved Level II evidence, indicating predictive potential.
- Six genetic biomarkers (SNPs in EET pathways, COMT, HMGB1, ACE, PAI-1, Hp) and 15 non-genetic biomarkers (e.g., pNF-H, ADAMTS13, Copeptin, GFAP, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, NLR) were identified.
Conclusions:
- Currently, no single biomarker offers definitive prediction of DCI after SAH.
- A combination of genetic and protein biomarkers shows promise for predicting DCI risk.
- Further validation of a panel of selected biomarkers in large SAH cohorts is recommended.
Abstract:
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a severe complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Clinical and radiographic features of SAH may be helpful in identification of individuals prone to DCI. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the present evidence on predictive value of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of DCI after SAH. We systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for publications before July 15, 2018, reporting correlations between blood/CSF biomarkers and occurrence of DCI and/or vasospasm in SAH patients. Included studies underwent quality assessment according to QUIPS and STARD guidelines. Level of evidence (I-IV) for each of tested biomarkers was assessed according to GRADE guidelines. Of 2181 unique records identified in four databases, 270 original articles and 5 meta-analyses were included to this review. Of 257 blood and CSF parameters analyzed in 16.914 SAH patients, there was no biomarker with positive association with DCI/vasospasm showing level I evidence. Twenty-one biomarkers achieved level II evidence and could be confirmed as predictive biomarkers. In this review, six single nucleotide polymorphisms (for EET metabolic pathways, COMT, HMGB1, ACE, PAI-1 promoter, and Hp genes) and 15 non-genetic biomarkers (pNF-H, ADAMTS13, NPY, Copeptin, HMGB1, GFAP, periostin, Tau, BNP, NT pro-BNP, hs-TnT, PA-TEGMA, MPV:PLT, NLR, and PLR) were selected as predictive DCI biomarkers. We propose that a panel analysis of the selected genetic and protein biomarker candidates would be needed for further validation in a large SAH cohort.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

