Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically
Published on: September 9, 2015
Optimization of Acquisition and Analysis Methods for Clinical Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using a
N B Semmineh1, L C Bell1, A M Stokes1
1From the Department of Imaging Research (N.B.S., L.C.B., A.M.S., C.C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Optimizing dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI (DSC-MR) imaging protocols improves cerebral blood volume (CBV) map accuracy in glioblastoma. Full-dose contrast agent protocols maximize accuracy, while lower-dose options offer viable alternatives.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Neuro-oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI (DSC-MR) imaging is crucial for assessing glioblastoma.
- Protocol variations across institutions hinder standardization and in vivo validation of cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps.
- Digital Reference Objects (DROs) offer a standardized method for evaluating imaging protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of routinely used DSC-MR imaging protocols for glioblastoma CBV mapping.
- To evaluate the impact of acquisition and postprocessing parameters on CBV map reliability.
- To identify optimal protocols for accurate and precise CBV quantification.
Main Methods:
- A digital reference object (DRO) with simulated glioblastoma voxels was used.
- 6912 parameter combinations were tested, including contrast agent dosing, pulse sequences, field strengths, and postprocessing.
- Accuracy and precision were quantified using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and coefficient of variation (CV).
Main Results:
- The optimal protocol involved full-dose contrast agent preload and bolus, intermediate flip angle (60°), 30-ms TE, and leakage correction (CCC=0.97, CV=6.6%).
- Protocols with reduced contrast doses were less robust, but a low flip angle (30°) protocol with no preload and full-dose bolus performed well at 1.5T and 3T (CCC ≈ 0.92, CV ≈ 8.5%).
Conclusions:
- Full-dose contrast agent protocols with preload and bolus significantly enhance CBV accuracy and reduce variability in glioblastoma.
- These optimized protocols can potentially reduce sample sizes and improve the reliability of CBV change detection in clinical trials.
- A low flip angle, no preload, full-dose bolus protocol presents a viable alternative when lower contrast doses are preferred.
Related Concept Videos
Population Growth
What is Population Genetics?
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Light Acquisition
Conservation of Small Populations
Inertial Frames of Reference
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
