Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Published on: March 24, 2023
Development of a survey form through Delphi study about adverse events associated with the miniscalpel needle, for
Sang-Hoon Yoon1,2, Haebeom Lee3,4, Chan-Young Kwon1,5
1Chung-Yeon Medical Institute.
Background:
Despite the wide usage of miniscalpel-needles (MSNs), information about MSN treatment-related adverse events (AEs) is insufficient. As the definition of AE might vary among physicians, without an exact definition for pain and hemorrhage, it is difficult to provide accurate information about AEs in MSN treatment to physicians, researchers, and patients. The aim of our study is to reach a consensus about the items and definitions of AEs that should be included in the survey form for prospective observational multicenter studies to record MSN treatment-related AEs. We will especially focus on obtaining a consensus on the definition of pain and hemorrhage caused by MSN treatment.
Methods:
Our study protocol is composed of 6 steps. First, we will identify the aim of the study. Next, we will conduct a systematic review to investigate MSN treatment-related AEs reported till date in Korea. Third, we will conduct a pilot observational prospective single-center study on AEs in MSN treatment. We will develop a standardized case report form to record MSN treatment-related AEs, including the causality, severity, and details of the MSN procedure at every site. Next, based on the pilot study, the Delphi study questionnaire will be developed by a panel composed of 13 physicians. The Delphi study will have 4 rounds with open questions and 4-point Likert-scale closed questions. Through these rounds, we will develop a consensus about the items and definitions of AEs that should be included in the survey form for future multicenter studies about MSN treatment-related AEs. Following this, a face-to-face consensus meeting will be held for a final agreement of survey form. The final survey form will then be approved by the related academic society for dissemination.
Discussion:
The aim of this protocol is to develop a survey form for future prospective observational multicenter studies on MSN treatment-related AEs. This protocol will present the research methodology for developing a survey form, which will improve consistency and reliability between MSN treatment studies. We believe that this protocol can evaluate the safety of MSN treatment.
Trial Registration:
Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0002849.
Insights
This study aims to standardize the reporting of adverse events (AEs) from miniscalpel-needle (MSN) procedures by developing a consensus-based survey form. This will improve the accuracy and reliability of safety data for MSN treatments.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology and minimally invasive procedures.
- Clinical research methodology and patient safety.
Background:
- Miniscalpel-needle (MSN) procedures are widely used, but data on treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are insufficient.
- Lack of standardized definitions for AEs, particularly pain and hemorrhage, hinders accurate reporting and patient information.
- Existing information on MSN AEs lacks consistency, impacting clinical decision-making and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a consensus on the specific items and definitions for adverse events (AEs) related to miniscalpel-needle (MSN) treatment.
- To develop a standardized survey form for recording MSN treatment-related AEs in future prospective observational multicenter studies.
- To enhance the consistency and reliability of safety data collection in MSN treatment research.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of reported MSN AEs in Korea was conducted.
- A pilot observational prospective single-center study was performed to inform the development of a standardized case report form.
- A Delphi study involving 13 physicians across 4 rounds was employed to reach consensus on AE definitions and survey items, followed by a face-to-face meeting.
Main Results:
- The study protocol outlines a systematic approach to developing a consensus-based survey form for MSN AEs.
- The methodology includes a systematic review, pilot study, Delphi technique, and consensus meeting.
- The developed survey form aims to standardize the recording of AEs, including causality, severity, and procedure details.
Conclusions:
- The developed protocol provides a robust methodology for creating a standardized survey form for MSN treatment-related AEs.
- This standardized form will improve the consistency and reliability of data in future multicenter studies.
- The research is expected to significantly contribute to evaluating the overall safety profile of MSN treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Survey Safety
Case Studies
Surveys
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Longitudinal Studies

