Ambu® Aura Gain™ versus Ambu® Aura Once™ in children: a randomized, crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Birgit Stögermüller1,2, Sigrid Ofner1, Bernhard Ziegler1
1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Purpose:
The Ambu® Aura Gain™ is a new second-generation supraglottic airway device that-because of a wider curvature and a wide airway tube-allows fibreoptic intubation. The purpose of this study was to assess the oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Ambu® Aura GainTM compared with the Ambu® Aura Once™.
Methods:
In this randomized non-blinded crossover trial with 50 patients aged 18 months to six years (10-20 kg), we compared the Ambu® Aura Gain™ and the Ambu® Aura Once™ for airway maintenance in anesthetized, non-paralyzed participants. Our primary outcome was oropharyngeal leak pressure. Time of insertion, success rates for each device, evaluation of fibreoptic view and ventilation quality during anesthesia, as well as possible complications (e.g., blood staining) were assessed.
Results:
There were no differences in first and overall insertion attempt rates (Ambu® Aura Once™ 50/50 (100%) vs Ambu® Aura Gain™ 50/50 (100%). Mean (standard deviation) oropharyngeal leak pressure was found to be significantly higher for Ambu® Aura Gain™ than it was for Ambu® Aura Once™ [21 (7) vs 19 (6) cmH2O, respectively; mean difference [MD] - 2 cmH2O; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 3.8 to - 1.0; P = 0.001]. Mean (SD) insertion time was faster for Ambu® Aura Once™ than for Ambu® Aura Gain™ [8 (3) vs 10 (4) seconds, respectively; MD, - 2 sec; 95% CI, - 2.9 to - 1.2; P < 0.001]. There were no differences in ventilation quality, fibreoptic view, or blood staining.
Conclusion:
We conclude that Ambu® Aura Gain™ is a good alternative to the Ambu® Aura Once™ and an efficient device for children in this age group.
Trial Registration:
www.clincaltrials.gov (NCT02811042). Registered 23 June 2016.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Gain
Gain:
Suppose Vin is the input and Vout is the output signal to a circuit.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

