Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Hemorrhagic Shock Research
Published on: March 22, 2024
Development of a clinical prediction model for diagnosing adenomyosis
Tina Tellum1, Staale Nygaard2, Else K Skovholt3
1Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Objective:
To develop a multivariate prediction model for diagnosing adenomyosis using predictors available through transvaginal ultrasonography and clinical examinations.
Design:
Prospective observational single-center study.
Setting:
Teaching university hospital.
Patient(S):
One hundred consecutively enrolled premenopausal women aged 30-50 years, undergoing hysterectomy due to a benign condition and not using hormonal treatment.
Intervention(S):
Preoperative 2-D and 3-D transvaginal ultrasonography investigations were performed, and the results were documented in a standardized form. Clinical information was collected using a questionnaire. Histopathology confirmed the outcome.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC)) of a multivariate prediction model for adenomyosis. Independent diagnostic performance of single predictors and their quantitative effect (β) in the final model.
Result(S):
The final model showed a good test quality (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.86, [95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.94], optimal cutoff 0.56, sensitivity of 85%, specificity 78%). The following nine predictors were included ([sensitivity, specificity, β] or [AUC, β]): presence of myometrial cysts (51%, 86%, β = 0.86), fan-shaped echo (36%, 92%, β = 0.54), hyperechoic islets (51%, 78%, β = 0.62), globular uterus (61%, 83%, β = 0.2), normal uterine shape (83%, 61%, β = -0.75), thickest/thinnest ratio for uterine wall (0.61, β = 0.26), maximum width of the junctional zone in sagittal plane (0.71, β = 0.1), regular appearance of junctional zone (31%, 92%, β = -1.0), and grade of dysmenorrhea measured on a verbal numerical rating scale (0.61, β = 0.08).
Conclusion(S):
We have presented a multivariate model for diagnosing adenomyosis that weights predictors based on their diagnostic significance. The reported findings could aid clinicians who are interpreting the heterogeneous appearance of adenomyosis in ultrasonography.
Clinical Trial Registration Number:
NCT02201719.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

