Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and methotrexate usage in paediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic

Margherita Nosadini1, Shekeeb S Mohammad2, Irene Toldo3

  • 1Neuroimmunology Group, Institute for Neuroscience and Muscle Research, Kids Research Institute at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Australia; Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA), and methotrexate (MTX) show potential in reducing relapses for pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE). Further research is needed to confirm their efficacy and safety in larger patient cohorts.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Immunology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Limited data exists on the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA), and methotrexate (MTX) for pediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE).
  • Anti-NMDARE is a severe autoimmune condition affecting the central nervous system, often requiring immunosuppressive therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the available literature on the use of MMF, AZA, and MTX in pediatric-onset anti-NMDARE.
  • To analyze the modes of administration, efficacy, and safety profiles of these immunosuppressive agents in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature review was conducted.
  • Included patients were treated with MMF, AZA, or MTX for pediatric-onset anti-NMDARE.
  • Data on treatment protocols, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Eighty-seven patients were included, with a median age of 11 years at onset; 46% experienced relapses.
  • MMF, AZA, and MTX were administered to 52%, 27%, and 15% of patients, respectively, often after other treatments.
  • Treatment with MMF/AZA/MTX was associated with a reduced annual relapse rate (0.03) and only 7% of patients relapsed while on these medications.
  • Adverse reactions were infrequent and generally low-grade.

Conclusions:

  • There is significant heterogeneity in the application of MMF, AZA, and MTX for pediatric anti-NMDARE.
  • These agents demonstrate a potential to reduce relapse rates and possess a reasonable safety profile.
  • Larger, prospective studies are necessary to definitively establish the efficacy and optimal use of MMF, AZA, and MTX in pediatric anti-NMDARE.

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K