Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

52.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
52.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elevated ESR2 and BRCA1 gene expression in adenomyosis associated with endometrial cancer: a pilot study.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology·2026
Same author

Preclinical models of female pelvic pain disorders.

Pain·2026
Same author

Menstrual distress in medical students: symptomatic burden, attitudes, and perceived unmet educational needs.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Molecular Characterization of Ovarian Endometriosis in Saudi Arabian Women: Insights into Inflammatory, Autophagic, and Epigenetic Dysregulation.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Changing the paradigm of endometriosis - from diagnosis to integrated long-term management: a joint society opinion paper.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Linzagolix, with and without add-back therapy, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: results from EDELWEISS 6, a double-blind randomized extension and withdrawal study.

Human reproduction open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.2K

Errors and pitfalls in reading the cardiotocographic tracing.

Mariarosaria Di Tommaso1, Viola Seravalli2, Felice Petraglia3

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - mariarosaria.ditommaso@unifi.it.

Minerva Ginecologica
|October 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Interpreting fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings during labor is complex. Common errors include misinterpreting decelerations and confusing maternal heart rate (MHR) with FHR, leading to potential interventions.

More Related Videos

Optimization, Design and Avoiding Pitfalls in Manual Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry
09:15

Optimization, Design and Avoiding Pitfalls in Manual Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry

Published on: July 26, 2019

10.0K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.2K
Optimization, Design and Avoiding Pitfalls in Manual Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry
09:15

Optimization, Design and Avoiding Pitfalls in Manual Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry

Published on: July 26, 2019

10.0K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Fetal Monitoring
  • Perinatal Medicine

Background:

  • Cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation during labor is a critical yet contentious area in obstetrics.
  • Accurate Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) monitoring is essential for assessing fetal well-being during labor.
  • Existing guidelines for CTG interpretation are often subject to varied application and potential misinterpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and elucidate common errors and pitfalls in the interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings during labor.
  • To highlight specific challenges related to oxytocin use and deceleration interpretation.
  • To address the critical issue of maternal heart rate (MHR) misidentification as FHR.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common clinical scenarios and documented interpretation errors in cardiotocography (CTG).
  • Analysis of specific obstetric practices, including oxytocin administration and management of FHR decelerations.
  • Examination of technical challenges, such as the potential for maternal heart rate (MHR) recording errors.

Main Results:

  • Failure to recognize and manage tachysystole during oxytocin induction is a significant error.
  • Misinterpretation of FHR decelerations, particularly without loss of variability, leads to unnecessary interventions.
  • Falsely reassuring FHR tracings can occur due to the misidentification of maternal heart rate (MHR) as FHR.

Conclusions:

  • Improved understanding and standardized application of CTG interpretation protocols are crucial.
  • Addressing specific pitfalls, such as oxytocin management and deceleration assessment, can reduce adverse outcomes.
  • Vigilance regarding potential FHR/MHR recording errors is necessary to ensure accurate fetal status assessment.