Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.7K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

248
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
248

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk factors for atypical femur fractures with and without bisphosphonate treatment: a national nested case-control study.

JBMR plus·2026
Same author

Multi-cohort proteogenomic analyses reveal genetic effects across the proteome and diseasome.

Cell·2026
Same author

Weight trajectories and obesity onset between 17 and 60 years of age, and cause-specific mortality: the Obesity and Disease Development Sweden (ODDS) pooled cohort study.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of intra-articular comminuted distal radius fractures (AO 23-C2/C3) is associated with better patient-reported outcomes: an instrumental variable analysis using a national Swedish cohort.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2026
Same author

Antibiotic use and gut microbiome composition links from individual-level prescription data of 14,979 individuals.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

The HUNT study identifies host genetic factors reproducibly associated with human gut microbiota composition.

Nature genetics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Models of Bone Metastasis
08:49

Models of Bone Metastasis

Published on: September 4, 2012

43.2K

Mendelian randomization in the bone field.

Susanna C Larsson1, Karl Michaëlsson2, Stephen Burgess3

  • 1Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bone
|October 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants to identify causal risk factors for osteoporosis, overcoming limitations of observational studies. This method helps clarify links between exposures like smoking and body mass index, and bone health.

Keywords:
Bone mineral densityFractureGenome-wide association studiesMendelian randomizationOsteoporosisSingle nucleotide polymorphisms

More Related Videos

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Models of Bone Metastasis
08:49

Models of Bone Metastasis

Published on: September 4, 2012

43.2K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Bone Biology

Background:

  • Osteoporosis prevention requires identifying modifiable risk factors.
  • Observational studies have limitations including confounding and bias, hindering causal inference for bone loss.
  • Randomized clinical trials are not always feasible for all risk factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the Mendelian randomization (MR) method for causal inference in osteoporosis research.
  • To highlight the advantages and limitations of MR.
  • To review MR applications in understanding osteoporosis risk factors.

Main Methods:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables for exposures.
  • MR leverages genetic associations to infer causal relationships between exposures and osteoporosis.
  • This genetic epidemiological approach minimizes confounding and reverse causation bias.

Main Results:

  • MR studies support causal links between serum estradiol, smoking, BMI, and type 2 diabetes with bone mineral density.
  • MR suggests no causal association for serum TSH, urate, CRP, or 25(OH)D with bone mineral density.
  • MR provides robust evidence for risk factors influencing bone health.

Conclusions:

  • Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for establishing causality in osteoporosis research.
  • It overcomes limitations of traditional observational studies for identifying actionable prevention strategies.
  • MR findings guide targeted interventions for reducing bone loss and fracture risk.