Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Prognostic value of scoring tools in severe trauma patients admitted to the emergency department
Insights
This study evaluated trauma scores for predicting mortality in severe trauma patients. The GAP score demonstrated the best performance, highlighting its utility in early prognosis assessment.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Clinical Prognostics
Background:
- Severe trauma significantly impacts young populations, necessitating early prognostic assessment.
- Existing prognostic scores for severe trauma require ongoing evaluation for accuracy.
- Effective triage and management depend on reliable prediction of patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic accuracy of four trauma scores in predicting mortality among severe trauma patients.
- To compare the performance of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), EMTRAS, and GAP scores.
- To identify the most effective score for early gravity assessment in severe trauma.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational study involving 298 severe trauma patients admitted to the emergency department.
- Evaluation of four trauma scores: ISS, NISS, EMTRAS, and GAP for mortality prediction at 30 days.
- Utilized univariate and multivariate analyses, including ROC curve comparisons and correlation analysis.
Main Results:
- The overall mortality rate was 21.5%.
- EMTRAS (≥3), ISS (≥16), and GAP (<20) were identified as independent predictors of mortality.
- The GAP score exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811, followed by EMTRAS (0.789).
Conclusions:
- Trauma scores, including physiological, combined, and anatomical scores, correlate with prognosis in severe trauma.
- The GAP score shows superior performance in predicting mortality, aiding early gravity assessment.
- These findings support the use of validated trauma scores to enhance triage, management, and prognosis for polytrauma patients.
Background:
Severe Trauma is a misleading cause of death in young people. Early assessment of prognosis is the cornerstone in the management of such patients. Several prognostic scores have been proposed during the last decade.
Aim:
To evaluate the prognostic performance of trauma scores in terms of mortality in severe trauma patients admitted to the emergency department.
Methods:
This was a prospective, observational and prognostic study with inclusion of severe trauma patients admitted to the emergency department over a 20 months period. We focused on the predictive value of 4 trauma scores in terms of mortality in severe trauma admitted to the resuscitation room. Four scores were included: ISS, NISS, EMTRAS and GAP score. Univariate and multivariate analysis of mortality at the 30th post-traumatic day were conducted with comparison of ROC curves of the scores. Moreover, Correlation between the several scores was studied.
Results:
We included 298 patients. The median age was 40 (15-90) years. The sex ratio was 4,5. Clinical characteristics were n (%): GCS ≤ 8: 62 (21); PAS <90 mm Hg: 32 (11) and pulse oximetry <90%: 44 (15). The median ISS was 17 (1-75) and 176 (59%) trauma patients had a score ISS ≥ 16. The median NISS was 22 (1-75). The median EMTRAS was 3 (0-9). The median GAP was 21 (3-26). The global mortality was 21.5%. Independent predictors of mortality were: EMTRAS score ≥ 3 (adjusted OR 1.80, 95% CI [1.05-3.08], p = 0.0033), ISS ≥ 16 (adjusted OR 2.05; 95% CI [1.26-3.46], p = 0.002), GAP <20 (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI [1.268-2.92], p = 0.002) 1.74, 95% CI [1.17-2.592], p = 0.005). The GAP score had the best AUC= 0.811 followed by the EMTRAS with an AUC of 0.789. Finally, all the scores were strongly correlated.
Conclusion:
Severe trauma is a dynamic process with a heavy morbidity and mortality. In our study, physiological scores and combined score were correlated with prognosis as well as anatomical scores and could be proposed for early gravity assessment in severe trauma enhancing triage, management and prognosis of polytrauma patients.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Emerging Adulthood
01:06Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
01:05Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
01:17z Scores and Area Under the Curve
01:30Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
01:07z Scores and Unusual Values
This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...