Baseline Prolonged PR Interval and Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and
Pattara Rattanawong1, Narut Prasitlumkum1, Tanawan Riangwiwat1
1University of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program, Honolulu, Havaí - EUA.
Insights
A prolonged PR interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients predicts worse outcomes. This meta-analysis confirms that a longer PR interval is linked to increased mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in CRT recipients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Statistics
Background:
- Baseline prolonged PR interval is increasingly recognized as a potential negative prognostic marker in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- Existing literature suggests an association, but a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze existing studies to assess the association between baseline prolonged PR interval and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing CRT.
- To quantify the risk of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcomes associated with a prolonged PR interval in CRT patients.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to March 2017.
- Included studies were prospective or retrospective cohort studies comparing outcomes in CRT patients with prolonged PR interval (>200 msec) versus normal PR interval.
- Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- Six studies involving 17,432 normal PR and 4,278 prolonged PR for mortality were analyzed.
- Prolonged PR interval was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.08-1.67).
- Significant associations were also found for heart failure hospitalization (RR=1.30, 95% CI: 1.16-1.45) and composite outcomes (RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.13-1.30).
Conclusions:
- The findings support the hypothesis that a baseline prolonged PR interval is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in CRT patients.
- This meta-analysis highlights the clinical significance of baseline PR interval in stratifying risk for CRT recipients.
- Routine assessment of PR interval may aid in patient selection and risk stratification for CRT.
Background:
Recent studies suggest that baseline prolonged PR interval is associated with worse outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature have not been made.
Objective:
To assess the association between baseline prolonged PR interval and adverse outcomes of CRT by a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis.
Methods:
We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The included studies were published prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and composite outcome of CRT with baseline prolonged PR (> 200 msec) versus normal PR interval. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
Six studies from January 1991 to May 2017 were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause mortality rate is available in four studies involving 17,432 normal PR and 4,278 prolonged PR. Heart failure hospitalization is available in two studies involving 16,152 normal PR and 3,031 prolonged PR. Composite outcome is available in four studies involving 17,001 normal PR and 3,866 prolonged PR. Prolonged PR interval was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled risk ratio = 1.34, 95 % confidence interval: 1.08-1.67, p < 0.01, I2= 57.0%), heart failure hospitalization (pooled risk ratio = 1.30, 95 % confidence interval: 1.16-1.45, p < 0.01, I2= 6.6%) and composite outcome (pooled risk ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.30, p < 0.01, I2= 0%).
Conclusions:
Our systematic review and meta-analysis support the hypothesis that baseline prolonged PR interval is a predictor of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcome in CRT patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Confidence Intervals
A...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Random and Systematic Errors


