Responsiveness and meaningful improvement of mobility measures following MS rehabilitation

Ilse Baert1, Tori Smedal2, Alon Kalron2

  • 1From the REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center (I.B., P.F.), BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Belgium; Haukeland University Hospital (Norwegian MS Competence Centre and Department of Physiotherapy) (T.S.), Bergen, Norway; Department of Physical Therapy (A.K.), Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.K.), Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine (K.R.), Charles University and Faculty Hospital Royal Vineyards, Prague, Czech Republic; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.H.-M.), Hakadal AS, Norway; Department of Neurology (R.E.), Clinic for Rehabilitation Münster, Austria; Eugenia Epalza Rehabilitation Center (I.E.M.), Bilbao, Spain; Clinical Center in Belgrado (U.N.), Serbia; Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM) (A.T.), Scientific Research Area, Genoa, Italy; National MS Center (P.H.), Melsbroek; AZ Klina (G.A.), Campus De Mick, Rehabilitation, Brasschaat, Belgium; John Paul II Rehabilitation Centre for People with Multiple Sclerosis (G.S.), Borne Sulinowo, Poland; Neurological Rehabilitation Centre Quellenhof (K.G.), Sana AG, Germany; IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (D.C.), Milan, Italy; Rehabilitation and MS Center Overpelt (S.B.), Belgium; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus (J.H.); and Section of Sport Science (U.D.), Department Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark. ilse.baert@uhasselt.be.

Neurology
|October 19, 2018
PubMed
Abstract