Improving the efficacy of municipal solid waste collection with a communicative approach based on easily...

The main aim of the study was to propose a useful methodological approach to define easily understandable indicators to use in communication campaigns organized to improve the efficacy of municipal solid waste collection. For this purpose, six economic-environmental indicators were defined, combining life cycle thinking and environmental communication. The indicators make it possible to obtain several combinations that can follow a variety of communication channels. Three indicators (quantity of recyclable materials recoverable from unsorted residual waste; total potential economic saving; number of jobs for young people as communicators) are expressed in absolute value and therefore refer to the whole community even if they are also good for single-targeted messages. The other three indicators (potential economic saving for each citizen; per capita saving of carbon dioxide equivalent; per capita saving of Disability Adjusted Life Years) are normalized with respect to the number of inhabitants and therefore refer to the individual citizen, but can also be used for global messages. As a case example, the methodology was applied to the collection of paper and cardboard in twelve Southern Italy cities obtaining very promising results. For example, the maximum quantity of paper and cardboard recoverable from unsorted waste would allow Naples and Palermo to recover more than €15 million. The maximum potential economic saving for each citizen was 25 €/capita. The economic saving obtained for Naples and Palermo could be translated in more than one thousand positions as young environmental communicators. Catania was the city with both the highest per capita potential saving of carbon dioxide (>60 kg CO₂eq./capita) and maximum hypothetical per capita 'life-time recovery' (almost an hour). The innovative communication method used ('Greenopoli') assumed that school is the starting point to obtain a change of mindset because speaking with students (all potential communicators) means indirectly communicating with all other targets.