Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.7K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

248
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
248

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A transfer RNA inosine modification drives genome-wide synonymous recoding across human commensal bacterial families.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Wastewater-based epidemiology to enhance public health preparedness and response during large-scale events: experiences from the 2024 Republican and Democratic National Conventions - Milwaukee, WI and Chicago, IL.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Water mass specific genes dominate the Southern Ocean microbiome.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Environmental reservoirs account for high levels of carbapenem resistance genes in wastewater.

Microbiology spectrum·2026
Same author

Troubleshooting common errors in assemblies of long-read metagenomes.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

New SAR11 isolate genomes and global marine metagenomes resolve ecologically relevant units within the Pelagibacterales.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.4K

Fecal source identification using random forest.

Adélaïde Roguet1, A Murat Eren2, Ryan J Newton1

  • 1School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Microbiome
|October 20, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study uses bacterial markers from Clostridiales and Bacteroidales to accurately identify fecal pollution sources in water. The random forest method precisely detects human and animal waste, crucial for public health and environmental management.

Keywords:
16S rRNA geneBacteroidalesClostridialesHigh-throughput sequencingMicrobial source trackingRandom forest classification

More Related Videos

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
06:27

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

592

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.4K
Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
06:27

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

592

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Environmental Science
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Gut bacteria like Clostridiales and Bacteroidales show host-specific patterns, making them potential indicators of fecal contamination.
  • Accurate identification of fecal pollution sources is vital for managing waterborne diseases and assessing environmental risks.
  • Existing computational methods for analyzing these bacterial markers are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a computational approach using Clostridiales and Bacteroidales for identifying fecal pollution sources.
  • To assess the accuracy, consistency, and sensitivity of this method in various sample types.
  • To provide a tool for effective risk assessment and management of water contamination.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized random forest algorithm with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences.
  • Focused on bacterial sequences from Clostridiales and Bacteroidales orders.
  • Benchmarked classification accuracy using fecal, environmental, and in silico generated samples.

Main Results:

  • Classifiers accurately identified human and animal fecal sources (approx. 90% accuracy).
  • Random forest predictions demonstrated high reproducibility and consistency.
  • The method detected low concentrations of fecal signatures (as low as 0.5% in silico).

Conclusions:

  • Random forest classification of 16S rRNA gene amplicons provides a sensitive and accurate method for fecal source tracking.
  • This approach effectively identifies microbial signatures of human and animal waste in environmental samples.
  • The developed method aids in rapid detection and management of fecal contamination in water resources.