Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG
Published on: June 27, 2011
Background EEG features and prediction of cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants: A systematic review
Annice H T Kong1, Melissa M Lai1, Simon Finnigan1
1The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Perinatal Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
Insights
Electroencephalography (EEG) shows promise in predicting cognitive outcomes for very preterm infants. However, findings are too varied to pinpoint the most effective EEG features for early identification of at-risk infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal neurology
- Developmental neuroscience
- Pediatric neurophysiology
Background:
- Very preterm infants face significant risks of cognitive impairment.
- Current methods for identifying at-risk infants are suboptimal.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) is a tool for assessing brain development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the relationship between EEG and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants.
- To evaluate the predictive capacity of EEG for cognitive impairment in this population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science).
- Studies included very preterm infants (≤34 weeks gestational age) with EEG assessments (≤43 weeks postmenstrual age) and cognitive outcomes (≥3 months).
- Meta-analysis was performed on studies with comparable EEG features to determine pooled sensitivity and specificity.
Main Results:
- 31 studies involving 4712 infants met the inclusion criteria, revealing heterogeneity in EEG methods and follow-up.
- Meta-analysis was feasible for only one category: dysmature/disorganized EEG patterns.
- Pooled sensitivity was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.72) and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) for predicting cognitive outcomes using these patterns.
Conclusions:
- Background EEG features show preliminary potential for predicting cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants.
- The heterogeneity of findings prevents definitive conclusions on the optimal EEG predictors.
- Further research is needed to standardize EEG analysis and identify the most reliable predictive features.
Objectives:
Very preterm infants are at risk of cognitive impairment, but current capacity to predict at-risk infants is sub-optimal. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to assess brain function in development. This review investigates the relationship between EEG and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants.
Methods:
Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search in April 2018 using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. Studies included very preterm infants (born ≤34 weeks gestational age, GA) who were assessed with EEG at ≤43 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and had cognitive outcomes assessed ≥3 months of age. Data on the subjects, EEG, cognitive assessment, and main findings were extracted. Meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity.
Results:
31 studies (n = 4712 very preterm infants) met the inclusion criteria. The age of EEG, length of EEG recording, EEG features analysed, age at follow-up, and follow-up assessments were diverse. The included studies were then divided into categories based on their analysed EEG feature(s) for meta-analysis. Only one category had an adequate number of studies for meta-analysis: four papers (n = 255 very preterm infants) reporting dysmature/disorganised EEG patterns were meta-analysed and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting cognitive outcomes were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.72) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) respectively.
Conclusions:
There is preliminary evidence that background EEG features can predict cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants. Reported findings were however too heterogeneous to determine which EEG features are best at predicting cognitive outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Cognitive Dissonance
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

