Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Gene Transfer for Ischemic Heart Failure in a Preclinical Model
Published on: May 15, 2011
Preferred Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis
Jie Xiao1,2, Fen Xu1, Chuan-Lei Yang3
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treating ischemic heart failure, reducing long-term mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. This finding offers clarity on optimal revascularization strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Ischemic heart failure management often involves coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Optimal revascularization strategy for severe ischemic heart failure remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of CABG versus PCI in treating patients with severe ischemic heart failure.
- To determine the optimal revascularization strategy based on long-term outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted using studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL.
- Twelve studies involving 9248 patients (4872 CABG, 4376 PCI) were analyzed.
- Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS).
Main Results:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in long-term mortality compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (HR=0.83).
- CABG also showed significant advantages in reducing the incidence of myocardial infarction (HR=0.51) and repeat revascularization (HR=0.40).
- Low heterogeneity was observed for mortality and myocardial infarction outcomes, while repeat revascularization showed moderate heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) appears to be a more advantageous treatment strategy than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ischemic heart failure.
- The findings suggest CABG offers superior long-term clinical outcomes in this patient population.
Abstract:
Clinically, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally used to treat patients with ischemic heart failure. However, the optimal treatment strategy remains unknown. This study examined the efficacy of the two coronary revascularization strategies for severe ischemic heart failure by using a meta-analysis. Studies comparing the efficacy of CABG and PCI were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The quality of each eligible article was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS), and the meta-analysis was performed using Stata version 12.0 software. Eventually, 12 studies involving 9248 patients (n=4872 in CABG group; n=4376 in PCI group) were subject to the meta-analysis for subsequent pooling calculation. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) [HR=0.83, 95% CI (0.76, 0.90), P<0.001; heterogeneity, P=0.218, I2=22.9%] of CABG compared with that of PCI revealed a statistical superiority of CABG to PCI in terms of the long-term mortality. Furthermore, CABG showed more advantages over PCI with respect to the incidence of myocardial infarction [HR=0.51, 95% CI (0.39, 0.67), P<0.001; heterogeneity, P=0.707, I2=0%] and repeat revascularization [HR=0.40, 95% CI (0.27, 0.59), P<0.001; heterogeneity, P<0.001, I2=80.1%]. It was concluded that CABG appears to be more advantageous than PCI for the treatment of ischemic heart failure in the given clinical setting.
More Related Videos
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
10:21Evaluation of Hydration Status by Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Exercise Stress Test
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management