Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
Characterization of EPID software for VMAT transit dosimetry
Marco Esposito1, Andrea Bruschi2, Paolo Bastiani3
1S.C. Fisica Sanitaria Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze, Italy. marco1.esposito@uslcentro.toscana.it.
Dosimetry Check (DC) software accurately reconstructs 3D dose distributions for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) quality assurance. It effectively detects delivery errors and anatomical variations, showing comparable accuracy to OCTAVIUS®4D in phantom studies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
Background:
- Transit dosimetry using electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) offers a method for verifying radiotherapy dose distributions.
- Commercial software like Dosimetry Check (DC) aims to reconstruct 3D dose distributions from EPID images.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the suitability and accuracy of Dosimetry Check (DC) software for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) transit dosimetry.
- To assess DC's sensitivity in detecting VMAT delivery, set-up errors, and anatomical variations.
- To investigate the influence of the dose computation algorithm on DC accuracy, particularly in inhomogeneous tissues.
Main Methods:
- Compared VMAT dose distributions reconstructed by DC with those calculated by a treatment planning system (TPS) using volumetric gamma analysis (3%/3 mm).
- Assessed DC accuracy against PTW OCTAVIUS®4D (OCT) in homogeneous phantom conditions.
- Introduced deliberate delivery and set-up errors, as well as anatomical variations, to evaluate DC's sensitivity.
- Examined the impact of density inhomogeneity on the dose computation algorithm within DC.
Main Results:
- DC showed agreement with TPS dose maps comparable to OCTAVIUS®4D in homogeneous phantoms (DC: 94.2% ± 3.4% vs. OCT: 95.6% ± 2.5%).
- Introduction of errors significantly reduced the gamma agreement index, with 38/56 cases exceeding the detection threshold.
- The DC dose computation algorithm demonstrated accuracy across anatomical sites, with a noted reduction in algorithm dependence for lung cases using an 'aqua vivo' approach.
Conclusions:
- Dosimetry Check (DC) software accurately reproduces VMAT 3D dose distributions in phantom studies.
- DC is sensitive to errors arising from delivery inaccuracies and patient-specific anatomical variations, making it a valuable tool for VMAT quality assurance.
- The software's performance is comparable to established QA methods, with potential for improved accuracy in complex cases through specific algorithmic approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Phase Transitions
Properties of Transition Metals
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Phase Transitions: Vaporization and Condensation

