Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Min Zhou1, Yonggang Wang2, Yong Ding1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Objective:
Since the introduction of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), the morphology of aneurysm neck has a great impact on prognosis of patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. In this study, we aimed to analyze the morphologic features and prognosis after EVAR for patients with hostile neck anatomy and tried to create a novel prognostic nomogram in predicting EVAR-related adverse events.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 812 patients with infra-renal AAA who underwent elective EVAR procedures between January 2010 and December 2015 at our single center and identified patients with hostile neck. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the significant prognostic factors for EVAR-related adverse events, which were then integrated to build a nomogram. The model was subjected to bootstrap resamples for internal validation. The discriminative ability was presented with calibration plots and measured by concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) from receiver-operating characteristic curve.
Results:
The overall EVAR-related adverse events rate for 323 patients with hostile neck was 12.1%. By multivariable analysis, significant risk factors of adverse events included female (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-5.62; P = 0.017), conical neck (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.5-14.51; P = 0.008), short neck (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.49-4.94; P = 0.001), and angulated neck (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.43-7.43; P = 0.005). A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariable analysis. Calibration plots presented an excellent agreement between model predicted and actually observed risk of adverse events after internal validation. The discrimination ability of this risk predictive model was reasonable (C-index = 0.79; AUC = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.73-0.89).
Conclusions:
EVAR is a feasible and safe treatment for most of patients with hostile neck. We developed and validated a novel model for predicting the risk of adverse events after EVAR and clarified high-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Heart
Mismatch Repair
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...

