Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Multispectral Real-time Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Detection of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Gynecologic Oncology
Published on: October 20, 2010
Can "Indirect" Contact Laser Surgery be Used for Fluorescence-Image Guided Tumor Resections? Preliminary Results
Vadim V Elagin1,2, Maria A Shakhova1, Marina A Sirotkina1
11 Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Abstract:
Ensuring the complete removal of tumor tissue is the main challenge during resection operations. Recently, a technique of "indirect" contact laser surgery has been developed. In this study we assess the possibility of using such surgery for fluorescence image-guided tumor resection. Mouse colon adenocarcinoma CT-26 cells stably expressing the fluorescent protein mKate-2 was used as the tumor model. Resections of the tumor nodes were performed with either a scalpel blade, a laser scalpel with a bare tip, or a laser scalpel with a strongly absorbing coating on the fiber tip. Tumor-positive resection margins were detected using an IVIS Spectrum fluorescence imaging system. After tumor resection with the scalpel blade over half of the animals needed one additional resection to remove residual tumor cells. Animals in this group showed tumor recurrence within 7 days. Fluorescence imaging of the tumor bed, performed after resection to assess the presence of tumor cell clusters, was sufficiently effective only with a bloodless resection. The laser scalpels both with the bare tip and with the strongly absorbing coating on the tip provided such bloodless tumor resection in contact mode. Fewer animals required additional resections when the bare tipped scalpel was used and this also resulted in a reduction in tumor recurrence. After resections were carried out with the laser scalpel with the strongly absorbing coating on the tip, fluorescence was detected in the operative field and this led to undertaking additional resections, although subsequent investigation suggested that this was "false" fluorescence, resulting from the effects of the scalpel rather than the presence of residual tumor cells. The method of laser resection with a strongly absorbing coating on the tip therefore did not appear to demonstrate definite advantages over laser resection with a bare tip when removing tumors.
Insights
Direct contact laser surgery aids fluorescence-guided tumor resection. A bare-tipped laser scalpel reduced residual tumor cells and recurrence compared to traditional methods or coated laser scalpels.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Complete tumor tissue removal is critical in surgery.
- Indirect contact laser surgery is a novel technique.
- Fluorescence imaging aids in guiding tumor resection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate indirect contact laser surgery for fluorescence image-guided tumor resection.
- To compare the efficacy of different laser scalpel configurations and a traditional scalpel.
Main Methods:
- A mouse colon adenocarcinoma model (CT-26) expressing mKate-2 fluorescent protein was used.
- Tumor resections were performed using a scalpel, bare-tip laser scalpel, or coated laser scalpel.
- Resection margins were assessed using IVIS Spectrum fluorescence imaging.
Main Results:
- Scalpel resection led to over 50% of animals requiring re-operation and early tumor recurrence.
- Both laser scalpels achieved bloodless resection, improving fluorescence imaging effectiveness.
- The bare-tipped laser scalpel resulted in fewer re-operations and reduced tumor recurrence.
- Coated laser scalpels caused "false" fluorescence, leading to unnecessary additional resections.
Conclusions:
- Indirect contact laser surgery, particularly with a bare-tipped laser scalpel, is effective for fluorescence image-guided tumor resection.
- The bare-tipped laser scalpel offers advantages over traditional scalpels and coated laser scalpels in minimizing residual tumor and recurrence.
- Coated laser scalpels may introduce artifacts that complicate intraoperative assessment.

