Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Molecular Shape and Polarity03:37

Molecular Shape and Polarity

75.7K
Dipole Moment of a Molecule
75.7K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

224
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
224
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

238
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
238

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responses and Nonresponses in a Bound Morpheme Elicitation Task by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Speaking of Screens: Longitudinal Associations Between the Home Media and Home Language Environment During Early Childhood.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2026
Same author

Alignment phase transition in socially driven motion.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Early Vocal Development in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Predicts Language but Not Autism Outcomes.

Pediatric neurology·2026
Same author

Screen Time Is More than Just the Screen: Indirect Media Exposure Dominates Infants' Digital Environments.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2026
Same author

Rethinking the Origins of Cross-Language Effects: How Heard Verbs Influence Japanese- and English-Speaking Children's Attention to the Details of Actions.

Developmental science·2026
Same journal

Body position classification using wearable sensors in infants with cerebral palsy.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same journal

Postural practices in infancy: How skill status and environment shape early motor development.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same journal

Dynamic associations between mothers' and fathers' parenting behaviors and infant physiological emotion regulation.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same journal

Multimodal behavioral analysis of child play interactions for early detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same journal

Characterizing infant leg movements using 72-h wearable sensor data: Descriptive analysis from a large, heterogenous sample of infants 0-2 months of age from the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study.

Infant behavior & development·2026
Same journal

Environmental mechanics shape segmental trunk control in moderate-to-late preterm infants: A longitudinal analysis examining predictions of the environmental-sensorimotor cascade.

Infant behavior & development·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
08:43

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research

Published on: June 20, 2017

7.8K

Reproducibility and a unifying explanation: Lessons from the shape bias.

Sarah C Kucker1, Larissa K Samuelson2, Lynn K Perry3

  • 1Oklahoma State University, United States.

Infant Behavior & Development
|October 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Integrating research on the shape bias in children is crucial for understanding cognitive development. Analyzing variations across studies reveals how task differences and individual pathways shape behavior.

Keywords:
Individual differencesReproducibilityShape biasTask effectsWord learning

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
08:43

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research

Published on: June 20, 2017

7.8K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Child Development

Background:

  • The goal of science is to understand complex phenomena, especially in developmental fields where changes occur over time.
  • The shape bias, a tendency to link new words to objects of the same shape, is a robust finding in child development.
  • This bias predicts vocabulary growth and potential language disorders, highlighting its significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue for the critical importance of integrating findings from multiple studies on the shape bias.
  • To demonstrate how variations in methodology across studies offer insights into underlying cognitive mechanisms.
  • To emphasize the role of task variations and individual developmental pathways in shaping behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Review of three decades of research on the shape bias phenomenon.
  • Analysis of variations in the definition and testing of the shape bias across different studies and laboratories.
  • Examination of how procedural differences impact performance and reveal underlying mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Despite the robustness of the shape bias, its definition and testing methods have varied significantly.
  • Differences in participant characteristics and task procedures yield critical insights into cognitive mechanisms.
  • Integrating data from multiple labs is essential for understanding how task variation and individual pathways influence behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Replication is important, but integrating diverse findings is critical for a coherent understanding of child development.
  • Variations in experimental procedures, even minor ones, provide valuable insights into cognitive processes.
  • Understanding developmental phenomena requires incorporating data from multiple sources to account for task and individual differences.