Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

11:57
Ecosystem Fabrication EcoFAB Protocols for The Construction of Laboratory Ecosystems Designed to Study Plant-microbe Interactions
Published on: April 10, 2018
19.2K
A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem
Alexander K Lancaster1,2, Anne E Thessen1,3, Arika Virapongse1,4
1Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Montclair, New Jersey, USA.
F1000Research
|October 23, 2018
Summary
The traditional scientific career "pipeline" is broken due to funding and career issues. A new "ecosystem" model, using decentralized and cooperative approaches, offers a better framework for scientific training and careers.
Area of Science:
- Science and Technology Policy
- Higher Education Studies
- Career Development in Science
Background:
- Institutions of science face challenges: declining public funding, university corporatization, increased adjunct faculty, and poor academic career prospects for postdocs.
- These issues reveal a disconnect between the market economy and higher education's scientific training expectations.
- Current solutions focus on fixing the linear career "pipeline," which is increasingly unrealistic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critique the limitations of the "pipeline" metaphor for scientific careers.
- To propose and define an "ecosystem" metaphor as a more fitting conceptualization of scientific training and the professional landscape.
- To outline design patterns for a dynamic scientific enterprise based on peer-to-peer, decentralized, cooperative, and commons-based principles.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the scientific career "pipeline."
- Development and articulation of the "ecosystem" metaphor.
- Description of practical design patterns for a new scientific enterprise model.
Main Results:
- The "pipeline" model is inadequate for addressing current challenges in scientific careers.
- The "ecosystem" metaphor provides a more dynamic and appropriate framework for understanding scientific training and professional development.
- Specific design patterns are proposed to foster a more adaptive and robust scientific enterprise.
Conclusions:
- Rethinking the scientific career structure beyond the "pipeline" is crucial.
- An "ecosystem" approach, leveraging decentralized and cooperative models, can create a more resilient and effective scientific enterprise.
- Implementing these principles can better align scientific training with contemporary career realities.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
22.4K
Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
22.4K
What is an Ecosystem?
47.0K
Overview
47.0K
The Soil Ecosystem
24.8K
Plants obtain inorganic minerals and water from the soil, which acts as a natural medium for land plants. The composition and quality of soil depend not only on the chemical constituents but also on the presence of living organisms. In general, soils contain three major components:
24.8K
The Scientific Method
66.3K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
66.3K
The Scientific Method
266.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
266.3K
The Scientific Method
65.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.2K

