Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Isolation of Primary Human Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells and Their Use in Creating a Microphysiological Model of the Renal Proximal Tubule
Published on: May 9, 2025
Non-invasive proximal adhesive restoration of natural non-cavitated proximal lesions
Marwa Abdelaziz1, Adele Lodi-Rizzini2, Tissiana Bortolotto2
1Division of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, marwa.abdel@unige.ch.
Purpose:
To investigate the infiltration potential of different self-etch adhesives into natural non-cavitated proximal lesions and the effect of dehydration protocol on the infiltration of a self-etch adhesive.
Methods:
29 extracted molars and premolars with natural proximal lesions (ICDAS 1-2) were sectioned through the lesion providing two samples from each lesion. To compare the different adhesives, three groups of eight lesions were abraded with fine metallic strips and then etched with 37% H3PO4 acid for 120 seconds. All teeth were stained with rhodamine isothiocyanate. After drying with compressed air and ethanol application, lesions were infiltrated with Scotchbond Universal, Clearfil SE Protect or OneCoat 7 Universal for 180 seconds and then coated with a thin layer of flowable composite (Tetric Flow). To compare the effect of dehydration protocol on infiltration, two groups of nine paired lesions were pretreated as described above. One group was dried using compressed air alone and the second group was dried using compressed air and ethanol, both groups were then infiltrated with Scotchbond Universal then coated with a thin film of flowable composite. After light curing, un-encapsulated dye was bleached by immersion in hydrogen peroxide. Remaining lesion pores were stained with sodium fluorescein solution. Thin cuts of the teeth were observed with confocal microscopy and computer image analysis was performed (ImageJ).
Results:
ANOVA and Duncan post-hoc tests showed no significant differences of the infiltrated area between the three adhesives (P= 0.835), no significant difference was found between the group dried with air compared to the one dried with air and ethanol. It can be concluded that the tested adhesives may be used for infiltration of natural lesions following the described pretreatment.
Clinical Significance:
Enamel pretreatment with metallic strip and 37% H3PO4 acid promotes the infiltration of different adhesives into natural non-cavitated caries lesions.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
Restorative Care
Adhesion
Capillary action is a result of water’s adhesive tendencies. When a narrow...
What is Natural Selection?
Nature and Nurture
Cell Adhesion in Plants
Pectins are complex heteropolymers mainly composed of negatively-charged α-D-glucopyranosyl uronic acid and some neutral glycosyl residues such as α-L-rhamnopyranose, α-L-arabinofuranose,...

