Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

In vivo Imaging Method to Distinguish Acute and Chronic Inflammation
Published on: August 16, 2013
A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
Tommaso Banzato1, Marco Bernardini1,2, Giunio B Cherubini3
1Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, AGRIPOLIS, Legnaro, 35020, Padua, Italy.
Background:
Distinguishing between meningeal-based and intra-axial lesions by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings may occasionally be challenging. Meningiomas and gliomas account for most of the total primary brain neoplasms in dogs, and differentiating between these two forms is mandatory in choosing the correct therapy. The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN, GoogleNet) in discriminating between meningiomas and gliomas in pre- and post-contrast T1 images and T2 images; 2) to develop an image classifier, based on the combination of CNN and MRI sequence displaying the highest accuracy, to predict whether a lesion is a meningioma or a glioma.
Results:
Eighty cases with a final diagnosis of meningioma (n = 56) and glioma (n = 24) from two different institutions were included in the study. A pre-trained CNN was retrained on our data through a process called transfer learning. To evaluate CNN accuracy in the different imaging sequences, the dataset was divided into a training, a validation and a test set. The accuracy of the CNN was calculated on the test set. The combination between post-contrast T1 images and CNN was chosen in developing the image classifier (trCNN). Ten images from challenging cases were excluded from the database in order to test trCNN accuracy; the trCNN was trained on the remainder of the dataset of post-contrast T1 images, and correctly classified all the selected images. To compensate for the imbalance between meningiomas and gliomas in the dataset, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was also calculated. The trCNN showed an accuracy of 94% (MCC = 0.88) on post-contrast T1 images, 91% (MCC = 0.81) on pre-contrast T1-images and 90% (MCC = 0.8) on T2 images.
Conclusions:
The developed trCNN could be a reliable tool in distinguishing between different meningiomas and gliomas from MR images.
Related Concept Videos
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Purposive Learning
Observational Learning
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

