Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

4D Multimodality Imaging of Citrobacter rodentium Infections in Mice
Published on: August 13, 2013
Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection in a residential care setting: A long-term prospective trial
Johan Arends1, Roland D Thijs2, Thea Gutter2
1From the Academic Center for Epileptology (J.A., C.U., P.C., J.v.D., R.L.); Center for Residential Epilepsy Care (F.T.), Kempenhaeghe, Heeze; Faculty of Electrical Engineering (J.A., C.U., P.C., J.V.D., R.L.), Eindhoven University of Technology; Leiden University Medical Centre (R.D.T.); SEIN-Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede and Zwolle (R.D.T., T.G., A.d.W., B.V., W.H.); and Brain Center Rudolf Magnus (J.v.A., F.L.), Department of Neurology, and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (G.v.T., K.C.B.R.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. arendsj@kempenhaeghe.nl.
Objective:
To develop and prospectively evaluate a method of epileptic seizure detection combining heart rate and movement.
Methods:
In this multicenter, in-home, prospective, video-controlled cohort study, nocturnal seizures were detected by heart rate (photoplethysmography) or movement (3-D accelerometry) in persons with epilepsy and intellectual disability. Participants with >1 monthly major seizure wore a bracelet (Nightwatch) on the upper arm at night for 2 to 3 months. Major seizures were tonic-clonic, generalized tonic >30 seconds, hyperkinetic, or others, including clusters (>30 minutes) of short myoclonic/tonic seizures. The video of all events (alarms, nurse diaries) and 10% completely screened nights were reviewed to classify major (needing an alarm), minor (needing no alarm), or no seizure. Reliability was tested by interobserver agreement. We determined device performance, compared it to a bed sensor (Emfit), and evaluated the caregivers' user experience.
Results:
Twenty-eight of 34 admitted participants (1,826 nights, 809 major seizures) completed the study. Interobserver agreement (major/no major seizures) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.89). Median sensitivity per participant amounted to 86% (95% CI 77%-93%); the false-negative alarm rate was 0.03 per night (95% CI 0.01-0.05); and the positive predictive value was 49% (95% CI 33%-64%). The multimodal sensor showed a better sensitivity than the bed sensor (n = 14, median difference 58%, 95% CI 39%-80%, p < 0.001). The caregivers' questionnaire (n = 33) indicated good sensor acceptance and usability according to 28 and 27 participants, respectively.
Conclusion:
Combining heart rate and movement resulted in reliable detection of a broad range of nocturnal seizures.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Design Example: Designing a Residential Plumbing System
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm

