Group Polarization
Assessment of apical pulse
Molecular Shape and Polarity
Laminins are the Adhesive Proteins of Basal Lamina
Assessment of apical radial pulse
Movement Joints in Buildings
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

In Vitro Apical-Out Enteroid Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Published on: June 8, 2022
Kia Z Perez-Vale1, Mark Peifer2,3,4
1Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
This study explores how epithelial cells maintain their structure and function through interactions between two proteins: Crumbs and Yurt. The researchers found that Yurt oligomerization helps regulate Crumbs activity, while another protein, aPKC, controls Yurt oligomerization. These findings provide insight into how cells balance apical and basolateral signals to maintain polarity. The study does not suggest new drug targets or future research directions.
Area of Science:
Background:
Cell polarity is a fundamental property of epithelial cells, ensuring proper orientation and function. It is maintained through complex interactions between apical and basolateral protein complexes. Prior research has shown that these domains exert mutual antagonism, but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. No prior work had resolved how apical Crumbs is regulated by basolateral components. That uncertainty drove this investigation into the role of Yurt. The study builds on known interactions between apical kinases and basolateral proteins. It was already known that aPKC regulates polarity, but its role in Yurt oligomerization was unknown. This gap motivated a closer look at how Yurt and aPKC interact. The research addresses the need to understand how polarity is dynamically modulated. It also explores the functional consequences of these interactions in epithelial cells.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to investigate how apical-basal polarity is modulated through interactions between Crumbs and Yurt. The specific problem is understanding how these proteins regulate each other's activity. The motivation stems from the need to clarify the mechanisms of polarity maintenance in epithelial cells. The researchers propose that Yurt oligomerization is a key regulatory step. They also suggest that aPKC may play a role in this process. The study focuses on the antagonistic relationship between apical and basolateral domains. The goal is to determine how Yurt and aPKC contribute to this balance. The findings could help explain how epithelial cells maintain their structure and function.
Main Methods:
The researchers used a combination of genetic and biochemical approaches to study Yurt and aPKC interactions. They analyzed epithelial cells to observe the effects of Yurt oligomerization. Fluorescence microscopy was employed to visualize protein localization. They also performed functional assays to test the role of aPKC in Yurt regulation. Mutagenesis experiments were conducted to assess the necessity of specific domains. The study included in vitro assays to measure Yurt oligomerization. They used live-cell imaging to track dynamic changes in polarity. The approach combined molecular and cellular techniques to dissect regulatory mechanisms.
Main Results:
The strongest finding is that Yurt oligomerization antagonizes apical Crumbs activity. The results show that aPKC negatively regulates Yurt oligomerization. Specific domains of Yurt are required for this interaction. The study found that aPKC phosphorylates Yurt, preventing its oligomerization. This mechanism helps maintain apical-basal polarity. The data suggest that Yurt and Crumbs form a regulatory feedback loop. The findings indicate that aPKC is a key modulator of Yurt function. The results provide insight into how epithelial cells balance apical and basolateral signals.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that apical Crumbs is antagonized by Yurt oligomerization. They suggest that aPKC regulates this process by inhibiting Yurt oligomerization. The findings support a model where Yurt and aPKC form a regulatory feedback loop. The study does not claim that Yurt is essential for all polarity functions. The conclusions are limited to the observed interactions between these proteins. The researchers do not generalize these findings to all epithelial cells. The study does not propose new drug targets or future research directions. The implications are specific to the mechanisms observed in the experiments.
The study suggests that Yurt oligomerization antagonizes apical Crumbs activity, maintaining cell polarity.
aPKC negatively regulates Yurt oligomerization, likely through phosphorylation.
Yurt oligomerization is a key regulatory step in maintaining apical-basal polarity in epithelial cells.
The study used fluorescence microscopy, mutagenesis, and in vitro assays to analyze these interactions.
The feedback loop helps balance apical and basolateral signals in epithelial cells.
The authors do not propose new drug targets or future research directions.