Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.1K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.1K
Affinity and Avidity01:41

Affinity and Avidity

39.0K
Overview
39.0K
Electron Affinity03:07

Electron Affinity

43.3K
The electron affinity (EA) is the energy change for adding an electron to a gaseous atom to form an anion (negative ion).
43.3K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.2K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

45.8K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
45.8K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.1K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benchmark Study for Calculations of p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> Values of Metal Ligands in Proteins.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Determinants of Bird Richness in the Louzishan National Nature Reserve: Effects of Productivity and Habitat Heterogeneity Across Taxonomic and Functional Dimensions.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

QM/MM Modeling of the Electronic Structure and Properties of the Fe-S Clusters in <i>Desulfovibrio desulfuricans</i> [FeFe]-Hydrogenase.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Deep-learning-assisted scattering structured-illumination confocal microscopy for industrial super-resolution imaging.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Ice-phase optothermal tweezers.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Investigation of Drug Responses in 3D Tumor Spheroid Models Using Two-Photon Scanning Structured Illumination Super-Resolution Microscopy with Frequency-Specific Denoising Enhancement.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
05:51

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method

Published on: July 19, 2019

6.7K

Predicting Relative Binding Affinity Using Nonequilibrium QM/MM Simulations.

Meiting Wang1,2, Ye Mei1,3, Ulf Ryde2

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science , East China Normal University , Shanghai 200062 , China.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|October 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accelerating quantum-mechanical (QM) binding free energy calculations is crucial. This study demonstrates that nonequilibrium (NE) molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski's equality can effectively speed up these computations.

More Related Videos

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

9.6K
Determining Binding Affinity KD of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Immobilized Antigens
07:39

Determining Binding Affinity KD of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Immobilized Antigens

Published on: June 23, 2022

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
05:51

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method

Published on: July 19, 2019

6.7K
Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

9.6K
Determining Binding Affinity KD of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Immobilized Antigens
07:39

Determining Binding Affinity KD of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Immobilized Antigens

Published on: June 23, 2022

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Molecular Dynamics
  • Quantum Mechanics

Background:

  • Calculating binding free energies with quantum-mechanical (QM) methods is computationally expensive.
  • Molecular mechanics (MM) methods are faster but less accurate for binding free energy calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the acceleration of QM binding free energy calculations using nonequilibrium (NE) molecular dynamics simulations.
  • To assess the accuracy of QM/MM free energy corrections derived from NE simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Binding free energies were calculated using molecular mechanics (MM) with free energy perturbation.
  • QM/MM free energy corrections were estimated using NE molecular dynamics simulations and Jarzynski's equality.
  • Ligands were modeled at the semiempirical PM6-DH+ QM level within a QM/MM framework.

Main Results:

  • The NE simulation approach provided MM → QM/MM free energy corrections consistent with other methods.
  • Sufficient precision (0.3 kJ/mol) was achievable with an appropriate number of NE simulations (36-324).
  • A total simulation length of 20 ps was adequate for most ligands studied.

Conclusions:

  • Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations offer a viable strategy for accelerating QM binding free energy calculations.
  • Jarzynski's equality can be effectively employed to obtain accurate QM/MM free energy corrections.
  • This approach balances computational cost and accuracy for binding free energy determination.