Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

108.8K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
108.8K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder01:30

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

986
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. It affects approximately 5-8% of children globally, with around 60-70% of cases persisting into adulthood. ADHD has significant implications for educational attainment, social interactions, and occupational success.
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
986

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interference from semantically distracting sounds in action scene search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Effects of wearing an opaque or transparent face mask on the perception of facial expressions: A comparative study between Japanese school-aged children and adults.

Perception·2023
Same author

Prefrontal GABA and glutamate-glutamine levels affect sustained attention.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2023
Same author

Occlusion of faces by sanitary masks improves facial attractiveness of other races.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Attentional biases toward real images and drawings of negative faces.

Acta psychologica·2022
Same author

Effects of wearing a transparent face mask on perception of facial expressions.

i-Perception·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.2K

Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture.

Tomoe Inukai1, Jun I Kawahara2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Kobe Shinwa Women's University, Kobe, Japan.

Frontiers in Psychology
|October 30, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Women exhibit greater attentional capture in temporal visual search tasks compared to men. This suggests potential sex differences in how attention is allocated, particularly in time-sensitive visual search scenarios.

Keywords:
attentional captureattentional controlsex differencesspatial visual searchtemporal visual search

More Related Videos

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.2K
Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Attentional capture, the diversion of attention by salient distractors, impairs target detection accuracy.
  • Understanding attentional capture is crucial for optimizing visual search performance in various contexts.
  • Sex differences in cognitive processes, including attention, are increasingly recognized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential sex differences in attentional capture using both temporal and spatial visual search paradigms.
  • To determine if women exhibit greater susceptibility to attentional capture than men.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms, such as attentional window adjustment, that may contribute to observed sex differences.

Main Methods:

  • Temporal visual search task (Experiment 1A & 1B): Participants identified targets in a rapid letter stream while ignoring a peripheral distractor.
  • Spatial visual search task (Experiment 2): Participants detected targets among distractors presented simultaneously in a spatial array.
  • Analysis of attentional capture magnitude across sexes in both temporal and spatial domains.

Main Results:

  • Attentional capture was evident in both temporal and spatial visual search tasks.
  • Women showed significantly greater attentional capture in the temporal visual search task compared to men.
  • No significant sex differences in attentional capture were observed in the spatial visual search task.

Conclusions:

  • Women appear more sensitive to bottom-up signals in temporal search tasks, indicating sex-based differences in attentional capture.
  • These findings suggest that sex differences in attentional window adjustment may underlie variations in temporal attentional capture.
  • The results highlight the importance of considering sex as a factor in visual attention research and its applications.