Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term
Natasha Pritchard1,2, Anthea Lindquist1,2, Isabela Dos Anjos Siqueira1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Customized weight charts better identify at-risk infants, including those born to obese mothers, compared to INTERGROWTH-21st standards. Customized charts identified more small for gestational age (SGA) infants with adverse outcomes like stillbirth.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Neonatal Health
- Perinatal Medicine
Background:
- INTERGROWTH-21st charts offer optimal growth standards but their utility in general populations is uncertain.
- Comparison with customized Gestation Related Optimal Weight (GROW) charts is needed to identify at-risk infants.
- Retrospective analysis of term births from 1994-2016 at a tertiary center was performed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if INTERGROWTH-21st charts or customized GROW charts better identify infants at risk.
- To compare the identification of small for gestational age (SGA) infants and their associated adverse outcomes.
- To assess chart performance in identifying infants of obese mothers.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort analysis of 71,487 term births.
- Infants classified as SGA using INTERGROWTH-21st <10th centile (SGA_IG10th), INTERGROWTH-21st z-score < -1 (SGA_IGzscore), or customized GROW <10th centile (SGA_cust).
- Primary outcome: Apgar score <7 at 5 min; secondary outcomes: Apgar <5, stillbirth, NICU admission.
Main Results:
- Customized charts identified significantly more SGA infants (10.6%) compared to INTERGROWTH-21st (4.6% or 8.2%).
- SGA infants identified only by customized charts (SGA_cust-only) showed increased risk of Apgar <7 and stillbirth.
- Customized charts identified a higher proportion of SGA infants born to obese mothers (19.3%) versus INTERGROWTH-21st charts (9.9-10.0%).
Conclusions:
- Customized GROW charts are superior to INTERGROWTH-21st charts in identifying SGA infants in a general obstetric population.
- Customized charts identify a subgroup of SGA infants with significantly higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes.
- INTERGROWTH-21st charts underestimate SGA identification, particularly in infants of obese mothers.
Abstract:
Background: INTERGROWTH-21st charts provide standards for infants born under optimal pregnancy conditions. However, their validity in a general obstetric population is unclear. We aimed to identify whether INTERGROWTH-21st charts, compared with gestation related optimal weight (GROW) charts customized on maternal height, weight, and parity, better identified the at-risk infant.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all term women who gave birth at a single tertiary obstetric center during the period 1994-2016. Routinely collected maternity data was used for analysis. The primary outcome was an Apgar score <7 at 5 min. Secondary outcomes included Apgar score <5 at 5 min, stillbirth or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Populations of newborns were identified as SGA by: (a) INTERGROWTH-21st <10th centile (SGAIG10th); (b) INTERGROWTH-21st z-score < -1 (SGAIGzscore); and (c) GROW customized charts <10th (SGAcust). The subgroups identified by only one chart were also specifically examined. Each SGA group was compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA) on all charts (non-SGA).Results: Data for 71,487 births were available for analysis after exclusion of women with missing height or weight data. Only 3280 (4.6%) newborns were considered SGAIG10th, with 5878 (8.2%) SGAIGzscore and 7599 (10.6%) SGAcust. INTERGROWTH-21st identified only 110 additional infants (0.15%) that were not identified by customized charts; none of these experienced any adverse outcomes. Customized centiles identified a further 4429 (6.2%) SGA infants (SGAcust-only) that were not identified as SGAIG10th, and who did demonstrate an increased risk of Apgar score <7 (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.08-3.28) and stillbirth (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.41-4.44) compared to the non-SGA infant. Significantly more obese women had infants considered SGAcust (19.3%) than SGAIG10th (10.0%) or SGAIGzscore (9.9%).Conclusions: Amongst our general obstetric study population, the 10th centile of INTERGROWTH-21st identified only 4.6% of infants as SGA and was less likely to identify infants of obese women as SGA. Customized centiles identified almost all SGA-IG infants, including an additional group (SGAcust-only) at higher risk of stillbirth and adverse outcomes compared with non-SGA infants.
More Related Videos
05:34A Mouse Model to Evaluate the Long-Term Structural and Functional Outcomes after the Reversal of Prolonged Unilateral Ureteric Obstruction
Published on: July 18, 2025
06:19Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Long-term Depression
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...