Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.7K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.1K
3.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.4K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.6K
2.6K
Ecological Succession02:17

Ecological Succession

21.5K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
21.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deference or sociability? Insights from dogs' and wolves' human-directed behavior in a food-conflict task.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Human-socialized dogs and wolves show similar behavioural reactions to human fear odour.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Invisible attitudes have visible effects on the behaviour of animals in scientific studies.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

On the (limited) use of touchscreen-based behavioural and cognitive research with dogs: potential causes and future directions.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

A Direct Observation of Infanticide by a Female Free-Ranging Dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>) Supports the Resource Competition Hypothesis.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.0K

A task-experienced partner does not help dogs be as successful as wolves in a cooperative string-pulling task.

Sarah Marshall-Pescini1,2, Camille Basin3, Friederike Range3,4

  • 1Wolf Science Center, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria. sarah.marshall@vetmeduni.ac.at.

Scientific Reports
|October 31, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Wolves outperform dogs in cooperative tasks due to tolerance, not cognition. Training one dog as an

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.2K
Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.0K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.2K
Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Animal behavior studies
  • Domestication research

Background:

  • Domestication theories suggest dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) possess enhanced cooperative abilities compared to wolves (Canis lupus).
  • Contrasting this, differing social ecologies, with wolves relying more on group cooperation, predict superior wolf performance.
  • Previous studies show wolves outperform dogs in joint cooperative tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cooperative differences between domestic dogs and wolves in a joint action task.
  • To determine if dogs' cooperative deficits stem from cognitive limitations or social tolerance issues.
  • To examine the influence of individual experience, affiliative bonds, and rank differences on cooperation in both species.

Main Methods:

  • A cooperative task requiring two individuals to simultaneously pull a rope for a reward was used.
  • Experiments involved dyads of wolves and free-ranging dogs with varying levels of task experience.
  • The 'expert' training method was employed, where one dog partner was trained to increase reliance on the other.

Main Results:

  • Wolves consistently outperformed dogs in the cooperative task, irrespective of experience.
  • Dogs' failures were primarily linked to social tolerance issues rather than cognitive deficits.
  • While 'expert' training improved dog dyad performance, it did not match wolf levels; cooperation remains challenging for dogs.
  • Closeness of affiliative bonds facilitated cooperation in both species.
  • Rank differences showed opposing effects: greater rank disparity aided dog cooperation, while closer ranks benefited wolves.

Conclusions:

  • Dogs' cooperative limitations in this task are rooted in social tolerance, not cognitive capacity.
  • The distinct socio-ecologies of wolves and dogs significantly shape their cooperative behaviors.
  • Understanding these species-specific differences is crucial for interpreting their social interactions and cooperative abilities.