Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coefficient of Variation01:10

Coefficient of Variation

8.6K
The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
8.6K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.6K
Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient01:24

Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient

2.9K
Activity is the measure of the effective concentration of the species in solution. It can be expressed as the product of the molar concentration of the species and its activity coefficient. The activity coefficient is a dimensionless quantity and depends on the total ionic strength of the solution.
The activity coefficient is a measure of the deviation from ideal behavior. When the ionic strength of the solution is minimal, the activity coefficient of an ionic species is close to unity, making...
2.9K
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

1.6K
The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
1.6K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.0K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Novel NPT Thermodynamic Integration Scheme to Derive Rigorous Gibbs Free Energies for Crystalline Solids.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A consistent dynamics view on nanoporous catalysts in action across length and time scales.

Faraday discussions·2026
Same author

Diamine Grafting of Pyrazole-Based MOF-303 for Diluted-Source CO<sub>2</sub> Capture.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

STable AutoCorrelation Integral Estimator: Robust and Accurate Transport Properties from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Quantitative Description of Strongly Correlated Materials by Combining Downfolding Techniques and Tensor Networks.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Generating a Stable Higher-Symmetry CsPbI<sub>3</sub> Perovskite Phase in Ambient Conditions: Unveiling the Stabilization Mechanism.

ACS nano·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.1K

Ab Initio Evaluation of Henry Coefficients Using Importance Sampling.

Steven Vandenbrande1, Michel Waroquier1, Veronique Van Speybroeck1

  • 1Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM) , Ghent University , Technologiepark 903 , 9052 Zwijnaarde , Belgium.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|October 31, 2018
PubMed
Summary

We developed a faster method to calculate Henry coefficients for molecules in porous materials using ab initio calculations. This new approach significantly reduces computational cost, enabling more accurate simulations of gas adsorption.

More Related Videos

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling
10:27

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling

Published on: October 21, 2018

13.0K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.1K
Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling
10:27

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling

Published on: October 21, 2018

13.0K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Physical Chemistry

Background:

  • Calculating Henry coefficients is crucial for understanding gas adsorption in porous materials.
  • Current methods like Widom insertion require millions of energy evaluations, limiting the use of accurate ab initio calculations.
  • Accurate force fields are often unavailable for complex guest-host interactions in materials like MOFs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel, efficient algorithm for computing Henry coefficients using ab initio energy calculations.
  • To enable accurate simulation of gas adsorption in porous materials by reducing computational cost.
  • To provide a more physically sound description of adsorption mechanisms compared to traditional force fields.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a hybrid approach combining Widom insertion with importance sampling.
  • Utilized force field simulations for initial configuration selection.
  • Performed targeted ab initio energy calculations on selected configurations.
  • Applied reweighting techniques to estimate the ab initio Henry coefficient.

Main Results:

  • Reduced the number of energy evaluations by over an order of magnitude.
  • Successfully applied the method to CO2 adsorption in Mg-MOF-74 and methane in UiO-66.
  • Demonstrated the necessity of ab initio methods for systems with strong guest-host interactions.
  • Highlighted the challenges in achieving accurate Henry coefficients due to varying theoretical levels.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method enables accurate ab initio Henry coefficient calculations at a moderate computational cost.
  • Ab initio calculations offer superior physical insight into adsorption mechanisms compared to generic force fields.
  • Accurate Henry coefficient prediction remains challenging, emphasizing the need for careful selection of theoretical methods and inclusion of effects like dispersion and many-body interactions.