Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: February 1, 2018
Use of a Psychological Evaluation Tool as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes
Tarun Prabhala1,2, Vignessh Kumar1, Eric Gruenthal1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Introduction:
Preoperative work-up for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) includes a psychological assessment; however, no one psychological factor has correlated with poor outcomes across studies. We developed a Psychological Evaluation Tool for Spinal Cord Stimulation Candidacy (PETSCSC), which includes all factors in the literature found to correlate with outcomes. In this study, we examine whether PETSCSC correlates with postoperative outcomes.
Methods:
Patients undergoing SCS were prospectively enrolled in this study. PETSCSC scores were obtained preoperatively. Numeric rating scale (NRS), global impression of change (GIC), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Beck Depression Inventory were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcomes were correlated with PETSCSC scores.
Results:
Thirty-four SCS patients had a mean follow-up of 9.88 ± 2.91 months. At latest follow-up, we observed significant improvement in NRS, PCS, MPQ, and ODI. Total PETSCSC score exhibited significant correlation with GIC (p = 0.026, r = 0.380) and improvement in PCS total (p = 0.041, r = 0.351), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.517) scores. The PETSCSC emotive subset significantly correlated with GIC (p = 0.020, r = 0.395). The PETSCSC depression subset significantly correlated with improvement in PCS rumination (p = 0.009, r = 0.439), PCS helplessness (p = 0.021, r = 0.393), PCS total (p = 0.021, r = 0.394), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.501). The PETSCSC therapy subset significantly correlated with improvement in MPQ sensory (p = 0.026, r = -0.381) and MPQ affective (p < 0.001, r = 0.583).
Discussion:
PETSCSC scores and subscores demonstrate significant correlation with pain outcomes used in assessment of SCS efficacy. Higher PETSCSC scores correlate with greater improvement in GIC, MPQ affective, and PCS scores. Stratification of these patients based on PETSCSC total and subset scores could help with prognostication.
More Related Videos
06:55Author Spotlight: Advancing Spinal Cord Stimulation - Exploring the Cellular Responses of Motor Neurons Through Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:37Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment RMCA in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Cord
The Spinal Cord
Spinal Cord: Information Processing
Sensory Information Processing
Sensory information processing begins at the sensory receptors located in the skin and other tissues, which detect somatic sensory stimuli such as touch, temperature, or pain. These receptors function as catalysts, initiating...
Spinal Cord: Gross Anatomy
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes