Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
Published on: October 18, 2024
Comparison of the Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Using OPDIII and Subjective Findings in Visually Normal Subjects
Mohaddeseh Alamdar1, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur, Ali Mirzajani
1Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology (M.A.), Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran; Department of Optometry (E.J., A.M.), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Refractive Errors Research Center (A.A.Y.), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, Iran; and Department of Medical Surgical Nursing (M.K.), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose:
To compare the visual acuity and refractive error using OPDIII and subjective findings in visually normal subjects.
Method:
This study was performed on 75 participants (134 eyes) with an age range of 18 to 35 years. Visual acuity was evaluated using both subjective Snellen chart and OPDIII devices. Also, OPDIII objective refraction was compared with subjective refraction. Paired t test was used to compare mean visual acuity and refractive error. The 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) were reported to evaluate the agreement between subjective and objective methods.
Results:
The mean Snellen visual acuity was 0.705±0.243 logMAR in group with myopia and 0.375±0.207 logMAR in group with hyperopia. Visual acuity obtained using OPDIII was 0.632±0.270 and 0.054±0.084 logMAR in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean visual acuity between OPDIII and Snellen chart. The correlation of the Snellen chart with OPDIII was 0.862 and -0.172 in myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively. The 95% LOAs of the OPDIII with Snellen chart were -0.33 to 0.18 and -0.14 to 0.79 logMAR in myopic and hyperopic patients, respectively. The mean spherical power obtained by OPDIII was more negative than that of subjective refraction (OPDIII mean difference -0.272±0.335 and 0.163±0.302 DS in myopic and hyperopic groups respectively), while the cylinder power was less than that of the subjective refraction (OPDIII mean difference 0.488±0.566 and 0.030±0.255 DC in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively). The correlation of OPDIII with subjective refraction was 0.905, 0.920 in measurement of the spherical power and 0.908, 0.928 in measurement of the cylinder power in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively.
Conclusion:
Visual acuity scores were significantly better using OPDIII compared with Snellen chart in group with myopia, whereas the Snellen chart provided the better visual acuity scores in hyperopic patients. Although the correlation of OPDIII with subjective refraction in measuring the refractive error was high, OPDIII showed a significant difference with subjective refraction.
Related Concept Videos
Cable Subjected to Its Own Weight
A generalized loading function is employed to analyze a cable subjected to its own weight. This function considers the force acting along the cable's arc length rather than its projected length, providing a more accurate...
Cable Subjected to Concentrated Loads
Cable Subjected to a Distributed Load
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
Neuroticism and...

