Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

mRNA Stability and Gene Expression02:51

mRNA Stability and Gene Expression

6.7K
The structure and stability of mRNA molecules regulates gene expression, as mRNAs are a key step in the pathway from gene to protein. In eukaryotes, the half-life of mRNA varies from a few minutes up to several days. mRNA stability is essential in growth and development. The absence of the proteins regulating its stability, such as tristetraprolin in mice, can cause systemic issues, including bone marrow overgrowth, inflammation, and autoimmunity.
Cis-acting Elements involved in mRNA stability
6.7K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps02:24

Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps

26.4K
Gene expression can be regulated at almost every step from gene to protein. Transcription is the step that is most commonly regulated. This involves the binding of proteins to short regulatory sequences on the DNA. This association can either promote or inhibit the transcription of a gene associated with the respective sequence.
Transcription results in the generation of precursor (pre-mRNA) that consists of both exons and introns, which needs further processing before being translated to a...
26.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine Learning Identification of Cell-Type-Specific Molecular Signatures Distinguishing COVID-19 from Other Lower Respiratory Tract Diseases.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Candidate Serum miRNA Features for Pan-Cancer and Cancer Type Classification.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Network Analysis in Microbiome Research: Methods, Tools, and Applications.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

The Role of EBV Infection and Epigenetic Factors in Radioresistance of Colorectal Cancer.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

RNA Large Language Models in Virology.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Protein Language Models in Virology: A Review of Advances and Applications.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Visualization of Endoplasmic Reticulum Localized mRNAs in Mammalian Cells
10:24

Visualization of Endoplasmic Reticulum Localized mRNAs in Mammalian Cells

Published on: December 17, 2012

14.7K

Tissue Expression Difference between mRNAs and lncRNAs.

Lei Chen1,2,3, Yu-Hang Zhang4, Xiaoyong Pan5

  • 1School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China. chen_lei1@163.com.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|November 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Messenger RNA (mRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) exhibit distinct tissue expression patterns and specificity. This research developed a new tool to differentiate these RNA types and uncover their biological functions.

Keywords:
cell typeexpression specificityfeature selectionlncRNAmRNA

More Related Videos

Isolation of mRNAs Associated with Yeast Mitochondria to Study Mechanisms of Localized Translation
14:44

Isolation of mRNAs Associated with Yeast Mitochondria to Study Mechanisms of Localized Translation

Published on: March 14, 2014

13.4K
Use of Single Molecule Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization SM-FISH to Quantify and Localize mRNAs in Murine Oocytes
08:18

Use of Single Molecule Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization SM-FISH to Quantify and Localize mRNAs in Murine Oocytes

Published on: April 24, 2019

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Visualization of Endoplasmic Reticulum Localized mRNAs in Mammalian Cells
10:24

Visualization of Endoplasmic Reticulum Localized mRNAs in Mammalian Cells

Published on: December 17, 2012

14.7K
Isolation of mRNAs Associated with Yeast Mitochondria to Study Mechanisms of Localized Translation
14:44

Isolation of mRNAs Associated with Yeast Mitochondria to Study Mechanisms of Localized Translation

Published on: March 14, 2014

13.4K
Use of Single Molecule Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization SM-FISH to Quantify and Localize mRNAs in Murine Oocytes
08:18

Use of Single Molecule Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization SM-FISH to Quantify and Localize mRNAs in Murine Oocytes

Published on: April 24, 2019

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Messenger RNA (mRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) are key regulators in transcription.
  • Next-generation sequencing has identified numerous lncRNAs, revealing their diverse functions.
  • Significant differences in tissue expression patterns between lncRNAs and mRNAs remain largely unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and delineate the tissue-specific expression differences between lncRNAs and mRNAs.
  • To determine if lncRNAs exhibit greater tissue specificity compared to mRNAs.
  • To identify potential cell models for lncRNA research.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 9339 lncRNAs and 14,294 mRNAs using 71 expression features.
  • Application of advanced feature selection techniques: maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), incremental feature selection (IFS), and random forest (RF).
  • Utilized the repeated incremental pruning to produce error reduction (RIPPER) algorithm for classification rule generation.

Main Results:

  • Identified 13 key features highlighting dissimilarities in lncRNA and mRNA expression.
  • Discovered specific cell subtypes with significant expression differences for lncRNAs and mRNAs.
  • Expression specificity and maximum expression features revealed distinct tissue distribution and levels for lncRNAs versus mRNAs.

Conclusions:

  • lncRNAs and mRNAs display heterogeneous expression patterns across different tissues and cell types.
  • The study provides a novel computational tool for classifying lncRNAs and mRNAs.
  • Findings facilitate the identification of potential biological functions for lncRNA subgroups.