Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
Published on: August 13, 2012
The Biokinetic Spectrum for Temperature and optimal Darwinian fitness
Ross Corkrey1, Cameron Macdonald1, Tom McMeekin1
1Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract:
Darwinian fitness is maximised at a temperature below Topt, but what this temperature is remains unclear. By linking our previous work on the Biokinetic Spectrum for Temperature with a model for temperature-dependent biological growth rate we obtain a plausible value for such a temperature. We find this approach reveals considerable commonalities in how life responds to temperature with implications that follow in evolution, physiology and ecology. We described a data set consisting of 17,021 observations of temperature-dependent population growth rates from 2411 bacterial, archaeal and eukaryal strains. We fitted a thermodynamic model to describe the strains' temperature-dependent growth rate curves that assumed growth was limited by a single rate-limiting enzyme. We defined Umes as an empirical measure of the temperature at which strains grew as fast and also as efficiently as possible. We propose that Darwinian fitness is optimised at Umes by trading-off growth rate and physiological efficiency. Using the full data set we calculated the Biokinetic Spectrum for Temperature (BKST): the distribution of temperature-dependent growth rates for each temperature. We used quantile regression to fit alternative models to the BKST to obtain quantile curves. A quantile is a value that contains a particular proportion of the data. The quantile curves suggested commonalities in temperature-dependencies spanning taxa and ecotype, consistent with the single rate-limiting enzyme concept. We showed that on the log scale, the slopes of the quantile curves were the same as the slopes of the thermodynamic model growth curves at Umes. This was true for Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya, and across other conditions (pH, water activity, metabolic type and trophic type). We showed that the quantile curves were the loci of the temperatures and growth rates that optimised Darwinian fitness for each strain at a given temperature-dependence and independently of other conditions. The quantile curves for Archaea and Bacteria shared a number of similarities attributable to the influence of the properties of water on protein folding. Other implications have impact on evolutionary biology, ecology, and physiology. The model predicts the existence of eurythermic strains that grow with about equal efficiency over a broad temperature range. These strains will have higher evolutionary rates with lower mutational costs that are independent of environmental conditions, a factor likely to have been significant during the Precambrian if the early Earth was warmer than today. The model predicts that random mutations are likely to result in shifts along the quantile curves and not across them. It predicts that some psychrophiles will be capable of performing well under climate change, and that selection will favour faster growth rates as the temperature increases. Last, it predicts trade-offs between growth rate and soma production, so that temperature-dependence, and possibly Darwinian fitness, remain constant over a broad temperature range and growth rates.
More Related Videos
08:12Author Spotlight: Exploring Light-Driven Chemical Reactions and Energy-Harnessing Devices in Photochemical Research
Published on: February 16, 2024
07:11ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
Published on: August 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
Induced-fit Model
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical...
Inclusive Fitness
Goodness-of-Fit Test
IR Spectrum
Transmittance is defined as the ratio of the radiant power passing through a sample to that from the radiation's source. Multiplying the transmittance by 100 gives the percent transmittance (%T), which varies between 100% (no absorption) and 0%...