Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Emotional Expression01:26

Emotional Expression

1.1K
Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
1.1K
Physiology of Emotion01:20

Physiology of Emotion

3.4K
The physiology of emotions is a multifaceted process involving the autonomic nervous system, brain structures, hormones, and neurotransmitters. This intricate interplay dictates how emotions manifest in the body and influence behavior.
Autonomic Nervous System
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in emotional responses by regulating involuntary physiological functions. It consists of two main components: the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. The sympathetic system...
3.4K
Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

719
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
719
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of Stigmatizing Language in Pediatric Clinician Notes.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

Protective Effect of Social Support Following Discrimination Varies by Group: Implications for Psychosis Risk Among Asian American, Latine, and White Young Adults.

Early intervention in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Gut-derived bacterial extracellular vesicles: the microbial dark matter contributing to host inflammation and cardiometabolic disease.

Gut microbes·2026
Same author

A Self-Guided App-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Individuals Who Experience Discrimination-Related Mental Health Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Community Partner Perspectives on Implementation Determinants of a Strengths-Based, Trauma-Informed School Suicide Prevention Intervention.

Implementation research and practice·2026
Same author

Negative Descriptors of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in the Electronic Health Record.

JAMA network open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
05:51

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 15, 2016

9.5K

Exploring Cultural Differences in Expressive Suppression and Emotion Recognition.

Michael Sun1, Anna S Lau1

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
|November 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Habitually suppressing emotions may impair recognizing others' emotions, especially with limited cues. Cultural differences in this link were minimal, though some Asian Americans excelled in specific emotion recognition tasks.

Keywords:
Asian Americancultureemotion recognitionemotion regulationexpressive suppression

More Related Videos

Human In Vitro Suppression as Screening Tool for the Recognition of an Early State of Immune Imbalance
14:01

Human In Vitro Suppression as Screening Tool for the Recognition of an Early State of Immune Imbalance

Published on: July 22, 2011

15.0K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
05:51

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 15, 2016

9.5K
Human In Vitro Suppression as Screening Tool for the Recognition of an Early State of Immune Imbalance
14:01

Human In Vitro Suppression as Screening Tool for the Recognition of an Early State of Immune Imbalance

Published on: July 22, 2011

15.0K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology

Background:

  • Habitual emotional suppression is linked to reduced social cognition and interpersonal adjustment.
  • Theoretical models suggest suppression directs attention inward, away from others.
  • Understanding the link between emotion suppression and emotion recognition is crucial for social functioning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between habitual emotion suppression and emotion recognition accuracy.
  • To examine emotion recognition across limited-channel and full-channel tasks.
  • To explore potential cultural differences in this association, particularly concerning Asian and European Americans.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed habitual emotion suppression tendencies.
  • Measured emotion recognition accuracy using limited-channel (restricted emotional information) and full-channel (multimodal) tasks.
  • Compared emotion recognition and suppression across U.S.-born Asian Americans, foreign-born Asian Americans, and European Americans.

Main Results:

  • No significant cultural differences were found in habitual emotion suppression or full-channel emotion recognition.
  • U.S.-born Asian Americans showed higher accuracy in limited-channel emotion recognition compared to other groups.
  • Interdependent self-construal correlated with increased habitual suppression and better full-channel recognition; habitual suppression negatively impacted limited-channel recognition.

Conclusions:

  • The link between habitual emotion suppression and emotion recognition shows minimal cultural variation.
  • While U.S.-born Asian Americans demonstrated advantages in limited-channel recognition, overall patterns were consistent across cultural groups.
  • Interdependent self-construal may influence both emotion suppression and recognition, but habitual suppression's impact varies by task demands.