Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
Published on: January 8, 2013
Patient-specific requirements and clinical validation of MRI-based pressure mapping: A two-center study in patients
Leonid Goubergrits1, Florian Hellmeier1, Dominik Neumann2
1Institute for Computational and Imaging Science in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Insights
MRI-based pressure mapping accurately assesses aortic coarctation, offering a noninvasive alternative to cardiac catheterization. This method provides equivalent results when sufficient image resolution is achieved, enabling safer treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
- Diagnostic Radiology
Background:
- Invasive peak-to-peak pressure gradients from cardiac catheterization are the standard for assessing aortic coarctation.
- Cardiac catheterization carries inherent risks and is purely diagnostic unless an intervention is performed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based pressure mapping against cardiac catheterization-derived pressure drop.
- To establish minimal clinical requirements for accurate MRI-based pressure mapping.
Main Methods:
- A prospective clinical validation study involving 27 patients with aortic coarctation undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- Utilized 1.5T MRI with 4D velocity-encoded sequences and 3D anatomical imaging.
- Calculated pressure drop using pressure mapping based on the pressure Poisson equation, comparing results with catheterization data.
Main Results:
- MRI pressure mapping demonstrated significant equivalence to cardiac catheterization for pressure drop (17.5 ± 6.49 vs. 16.6 ± 6.53 mmHg, P < 0.001).
- Equivalence was achieved in patients without imaging artifacts and with spatial resolution ≥5 voxels/diameter.
Conclusions:
- MRI-based pressure mapping is an accurate, noninvasive method for assessing aortic coarctation, equivalent to invasive pressure gradients.
- This technique is reliable for pre-procedural assessment in patients without prior stenting and with adequate image resolution, facilitating noninvasive treatment planning.
Background:
Invasive peak-to-peak pressure gradients are the current clinical reference standard for assessing aortic coarctation. To obtain them, patients need to undergo arterial heart catheterization. Unless an intervention is performed, the procedure remains purely diagnostic, while the concomitant risks remain.
Purpose:
To validate MRI-based pressure mapping against pressure drop derived from heart catheterization and to define minimal clinical requirements.
Study Type:
Prospective clinical validation study.
Population:
Twenty-seven coarctation patients with an indicated heart catheterization were enrolled at two clinical centers.
Mri Sequences:
1.5T including 4D velocity-encoded MRI and 3D anatomical imaging of the aorta.
Assessment:
Pressure drop across the stenosis was calculated by pressure mapping based on the pressure Poisson equation. Calculated pressure drops were compared with catheter measured data. Spatial and temporal resolution were analyzed using in silico phantom-based data as well as in vivo measurements.
Statistics:
Pressure drop was compared to peak-to-peak measurements. A two-sample paired mean equivalence test was used.
Results:
In patients without imaging artifacts and a required spatial resolution ≥5 voxel/diameter, significant equivalence of pressure mapping compared to heart catheterization was found (17.5 ± 6.49 vs. 16.6 ± 6.53 mmHg, P < 0.001).
Data Conclusion:
Pressure mapping provides equivalent accuracy to pressure drop obtained from heart catheterization in patients 1) without previous stenting and 2) with sufficient spatial image resolution (at least 5 voxels/diameter). In these patients the method can reliably be performed prior to the actual procedure, and thus allows safe noninvasive treatment planning based on MRI.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:81-89.
More Related Videos
06:31Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
10:42Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
Published on: June 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients