A systematic review of the use of rifaximin for Clostridium difficile infections

Qin Xiang Ng1, Wayren Loke2, Nadine Xinhui Foo2

  • 1National University Hospital, National University Health System, 119074, Singapore; MOH Holdings Pte Ltd, 1 Maritime Square, 099253, Singapore.

Anaerobe
|November 5, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Rifaximin shows promise for treating Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and reducing recurrence, but resistance is a concern. Further research is needed to confirm its efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of hospital-acquired illness, morbidity, and mortality.
  • Rifaximin, a nonabsorbable rifamycin, exhibits potent in vitro activity against C. difficile.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the clinical role of rifaximin in the management of Clostridium difficile infection.
  • To evaluate rifaximin's efficacy as a standalone therapy and in combination with other treatments for CDI.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of eight clinical trials was conducted.
  • Literature search used keywords [clostridium OR difficile OR colitis] AND [rifaximin OR xifaxan OR rifagut] across major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar).
  • Data were collected from papers published between January 1, 1988, and July 1, 2018.

Main Results:

  • Rifaximin is a potential alternative for mild-moderate CDI and shows efficacy in reducing CDI recurrence when used with other therapies.
  • Reported resistance rates to rifaximin range from 29.1% to 48.9%, with geographical variations.
  • Rifaximin possesses eubiotic properties that positively modulate gut flora, suggesting a therapeutic role in CDI management.

Conclusions:

  • Rifaximin may be a viable option for CDI treatment and recurrence prevention, particularly due to its gut flora modulation.
  • Paucity of randomized controlled trials necessitates larger, diverse studies to confirm efficacy.
  • Cost-benefit analyses are recommended due to rifaximin's relatively high cost.

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K