Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
Published on: June 7, 2024
Why does the Quiet Eye improve aiming accuracy? Testing a motor preparation hypothesis with brain potential
Yuuki Mizusaki1, Sachi Ikudome2, Yasumitsu Ishii3
1Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma, Jyounann, Fukuoka, Japan. y.mizusaki0201@gmail.com.
Quiet Eye training improved dart performance, but did not alter movement-related cortical potentials. Longer studies may be needed to detect EEG changes related to Quiet Eye acquisition and motor control.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Sports Science
- Motor Control
Background:
- The Quiet Eye (QE) is a phenomenon in sports where elite performers exhibit a longer final fixation on a target before movement initiation.
- Understanding the neural underpinnings of QE is crucial for optimizing motor skill acquisition and performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between Quiet Eye (QE) acquisition and motor preparation processes.
- To examine changes in movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) following QE training.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a dart throw task while wearing eye-tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) equipment.
- Participants were assigned to either a Quiet Eye training group (QET) or a control training group (CT).
- MRCPs were analyzed based on performance scores and QE fixation durations (High/Low performance, Long/Short fixation).
Main Results:
- The Quiet Eye training group (QET) successfully acquired QE characteristics.
- No significant differences in MRCPs were observed between the QET and control training groups.
- EEG changes related to QE acquisition may require longer experimental durations to become apparent.
Conclusions:
- While QE training can enhance performance and lead to characteristic QE behaviors, its immediate impact on early motor preparation (MRCPs) may not be detectable with current methods.
- QE duration might influence both motor programming and online motor control processes.
- Future research should consider longitudinal designs to better understand the neural adaptations associated with QE training.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

